Lichtlen P R
Cardiovasc Drugs Ther. 1996 Sep;10(4):409-12. doi: 10.1007/BF00051104.
The paper discusses the controversial attitude regarding the safety of calcium channel blockers (CCBs), especially of the dihydropyridine nifedipine, induced through several meta-analyses of studies with CCBs by Dr. Furberg et al.; as a result, a detrimental effect of CCBs, especially during acute myocardial infarction, has been claimed. Several independent re-analyses of the 16 studies, all performed in the 1980s and mainly using the short-acting nifedipine capsule, did not confirm Furberg's results and showed an insignificant mortality difference between patients on CCBs versus those on control. Nevertheless, new safety studies applying long-acting CCBs (half-lives of 1 or more days) combined with efficacy assessments are necessary, both in hypertension as well as coronary artery disease, to finally clear up this important question.
本文讨论了关于钙通道阻滞剂(CCB)安全性的争议性态度,特别是由弗伯格博士等人对CCB相关研究进行的多项荟萃分析所引发的对二氢吡啶类硝苯地平安全性的争议;结果,有人声称CCB有有害作用,尤其是在急性心肌梗死期间。对这16项研究进行的几项独立重新分析,均在20世纪80年代进行,且主要使用短效硝苯地平胶囊,并未证实弗伯格的结果,显示服用CCB的患者与服用对照药物的患者之间死亡率差异不显著。尽管如此,仍有必要在高血压和冠状动脉疾病中开展新的安全性研究,应用长效CCB(半衰期为1天或更长时间)并结合疗效评估,以最终厘清这个重要问题。