• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

囚徒困境进化研究中的偏好性伙伴选择

Preferential partner selection in an evolutionary study of Prisoner's Dilemma.

作者信息

Ashlock D, Smucker M D, Stanley E A, Tesfatsion L

机构信息

Department of Mathematics, Iowa State University, Ames 50011-1070, USA.

出版信息

Biosystems. 1996;37(1-2):99-125. doi: 10.1016/0303-2647(95)01548-5.

DOI:10.1016/0303-2647(95)01548-5
PMID:8924642
Abstract

Partner selection is an important process in many social interactions, permitting individuals to decrease the risks associated with cooperation. In large populations, defectors may escape punishment by roving from partner to partner, but defectors in smaller populations risk social isolation. We investigate these possibilities for an evolutionary Prisoner's Dilemma in which agents use expected payoffs to choose and refuse partners. In comparison to random or round-robin partner matching, we find that the average payoffs attained with preferential partner selection tend to be more narrowly confined to a few isolated payoff regions. Most ecologies evolve to essentially full cooperative behavior, but when agents are intolerant of defections, or when the costs of refusal and social isolation are small, we also see the emergence of wallflower ecologies in which all agents are socially isolated. Between these two extremes, we see the emergence of ecologies whose agents tend to engage in a small number of defections followed by cooperation thereafter. The latter ecologies exhibit a plethora of interesting social interaction patterns.

摘要

伙伴选择是许多社会互动中的一个重要过程,它使个体能够降低与合作相关的风险。在大群体中,背叛者可能通过不断更换伙伴来逃避惩罚,但在小群体中的背叛者则面临社会孤立的风险。我们研究了在进化囚徒困境中的这些可能性,在这种困境中,参与者利用预期收益来选择和拒绝伙伴。与随机或循环伙伴匹配相比,我们发现通过优先选择伙伴获得的平均收益往往更狭窄地局限于少数几个孤立的收益区域。大多数生态系统会进化到基本完全合作的行为,但当参与者不能容忍背叛行为时,或者当拒绝和社会孤立的成本很小时,我们也会看到壁花生态系统的出现,在这种生态系统中所有参与者都处于社会孤立状态。在这两个极端之间,我们看到了一些生态系统的出现,其参与者倾向于先进行少量的背叛行为,然后再进行合作。后一种生态系统展现出了大量有趣的社会互动模式。

相似文献

1
Preferential partner selection in an evolutionary study of Prisoner's Dilemma.囚徒困境进化研究中的偏好性伙伴选择
Biosystems. 1996;37(1-2):99-125. doi: 10.1016/0303-2647(95)01548-5.
2
Collapse of cooperation in evolving games.进化博弈中合作的瓦解。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 Dec 9;111(49):17558-63. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1408618111. Epub 2014 Nov 24.
3
Transforming the dilemma.转变困境。
Evolution. 2007 Oct;61(10):2281-92. doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2007.00196.x. Epub 2007 Aug 17.
4
The continuous Prisoner's dilemma: II. Linear reactive strategies with noise.连续囚徒困境:II. 带噪声的线性反应策略
J Theor Biol. 1999 Oct 7;200(3):323-38. doi: 10.1006/jtbi.1999.0997.
5
Environment-based preference selection promotes cooperation in spatial prisoner's dilemma game.基于环境的偏好选择促进空间囚徒困境博弈中的合作。
Sci Rep. 2018 Oct 23;8(1):15616. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-34116-0.
6
Interaction times change evolutionary outcomes: Two-player matrix games.交互时间改变进化结果:双人矩阵博弈
J Theor Biol. 2017 Mar 7;416:199-207. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2017.01.010. Epub 2017 Jan 6.
7
Cooperation and assortativity with dynamic partner updating.合作和动态伙伴更新的关联。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012 Sep 4;109(36):14363-8. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1120867109. Epub 2012 Aug 17.
8
Examining the role of individual movement in promoting coexistence in a spatially explicit prisoner's dilemma.考察个体移动在空间明确的囚徒困境中促进共存的作用。
J Theor Biol. 2017 Apr 21;419:323-332. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2017.02.028. Epub 2017 Feb 27.
9
Effects of punishment in a mobile population playing the prisoner's dilemma game.惩罚对参与囚徒困境博弈的流动人群的影响。
Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2011 Dec;84(6 Pt 2):066115. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.84.066115. Epub 2011 Dec 20.
10
Evolutionary prisoner's dilemma on evolving random networks.演化随机网络上的进化囚徒困境
Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2014 Apr;89(4):042142. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.89.042142. Epub 2014 Apr 28.

引用本文的文献

1
A marine cleaning mutualism provides new insights in biological market dynamics.一种海洋清洁共生关系为生物市场动态提供了新见解。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2023 May 8;378(1876):20210501. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2021.0501. Epub 2023 Mar 20.
2
Coevolution between positive reciprocity, punishment, and partner switching in repeated interactions.重复互动中积极互惠、惩罚与伙伴切换之间的协同进化。
Proc Biol Sci. 2016 Jun 15;283(1832). doi: 10.1098/rspb.2016.0488.
3
Biological trade and markets.生物贸易与市场
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2016 Feb 5;371(1687):20150101. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2015.0101.
4
Is cooperation viable in mobile organisms? Simple Walk Away rule favors the evolution of cooperation in groups.在移动生物中合作是否可行?简单的“走开”规则有利于群体中合作行为的进化。
Evol Hum Behav. 2011 Jul;32(4):263-276. doi: 10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2011.01.002.
5
The evolution of prompt reaction to adverse ties.对不良关系的即时反应的演变。
BMC Evol Biol. 2008 Oct 17;8:287. doi: 10.1186/1471-2148-8-287.