Green A
Int J Psychoanal. 1995 Oct;76 ( Pt 5):871-83.
This paper, prepared as a Sigmund Freud birthday lecture for the Anna Freud Centre, takes the opportunity to clarify and to debate some of the misunderstandings surrounding the meaning and significance of sexuality in psychoanalysis. The author departs from twin observations he has made in the last ten years: direct discussion of sexuality seems to have become marginalised and restricted to specialised papers in psychoanalytic journals. Attempting to question and understand this trend the author recalls that Freud placed sexuality at the centre of psychic development, psychoanalytic theory and clinical work. The contemporary and fashionable focus on object relations, pregenital fixations, borderline pathology and theories and techniques drawn from observations of child development have obscured, the author argues, the meaning and importance of sexuality in psychoanalytic theory and practice. A condensed review of Freud's ideas about sexuality and a re-evaluation of them is aimed at restoring the importance of genital sexuality and the Oedipus complex to their central place. For this author today's sexuality is not Freud's sexuality.
本文是为安娜·弗洛伊德中心举办的西格蒙德·弗洛伊德诞辰讲座而撰写的，借此机会澄清并探讨一些围绕精神分析中性欲的意义和重要性的误解。作者基于过去十年的两项观察展开论述：对性欲的直接讨论似乎已被边缘化，局限于精神分析期刊上的专业论文。为试图质疑并理解这一趋势，作者回顾了弗洛伊德将性欲置于心理发展、精神分析理论及临床工作核心位置的观点。作者认为，当代流行的对客体关系、前生殖器固着、边缘性病理以及源自儿童发展观察的理论和技术的关注，已模糊了性欲在精神分析理论与实践中的意义和重要性。对弗洛伊德关于性欲的观点进行简要回顾并重新评估，旨在将生殖性欲和俄狄浦斯情结的重要性恢复到其核心地位。在这位作者看来，如今的性欲已非弗洛伊德所指的性欲。
