Gabbard G O
Menninger Clinic, Topeka Institute for Psychoanalysis, USA.
J Am Psychoanal Assoc. 1995;43(4):1115-36. doi: 10.1177/000306519504300408.
The notion of professional boundaries is a relatively recent addition to psychoanalytic practice. Freud and his early disciples indulged in a good deal of trial and error as they evolved psychoanalytic technique. The study of these early boundary violations illuminates the study of the evolution of the concepts of transference and countertransference. The recent publication of the correspondence between Freud and Jung, between Freud and Ferenczi, and between Freud and Jones has provided us with extraordinary insights into the boundary transgressions that occurred in the early days of psychoanalysis. The boundary violations of the analytic pioneers have contributed to the legacy inherited by future generations of analysts. Institutional resistance to addressing these difficulties in contemporary psychoanalytic practice may relate in part to the ambiguities surrounding boundaries in the training analysis itself.
职业界限的概念是精神分析实践中相对较新的补充内容。弗洛伊德及其早期弟子在发展精神分析技术时经历了大量的尝试与错误。对这些早期界限侵犯的研究有助于阐明移情和反移情概念的演变。最近出版的弗洛伊德与荣格、弗洛伊德与费伦齐以及弗洛伊德与琼斯之间的通信,让我们对精神分析早期发生的界限侵犯有了非凡的洞察。分析先驱们的界限侵犯行为为后世分析师继承的遗产做出了贡献。当代精神分析实践中机构层面在处理这些难题时的阻力,可能部分与训练分析本身界限的模糊性有关。