• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[风险作为医疗保健中的一个概念和挑战]

[Risk as a concept and a challenge in health care].

作者信息

Graff-Iversen S

机构信息

Statens helseundersøkelser, Oslo.

出版信息

Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 1996 Sep 20;116(22):2669-72.

PMID:8928145
Abstract

In epidemiology and preventive medicine, absolute risk, relative risk and population attributable risk are well defined concepts. In research, the relative risks are of great interest, but to make medical decisions it is necessary to assess the risks and benefits in absolute rather than relative terms. Therefore, editors and referees should promote the presentation of absolute risks in medical journals. Critical comments on risk interventions are often of a general nature, and include all risk factors and all actual interventions. To assess the benefits, each disease, each risk, and each intervention has to be handled separately. In the prevention of cardiovascular diseases the effects of several interventions have been documented. The quality of the performance is of great importance, however, when interventions from clinical trials are applied in practical medicine.

摘要

在流行病学和预防医学中,绝对风险、相对风险和人群归因风险是定义明确的概念。在研究中,相对风险备受关注,但在做出医疗决策时,有必要从绝对而非相对的角度评估风险和益处。因此,编辑和审稿人应推动医学期刊呈现绝对风险。对风险干预的批判性评论通常较为笼统,涵盖所有风险因素和所有实际干预措施。为评估益处,每种疾病、每种风险和每种干预都必须分别处理。在心血管疾病的预防方面,已有多项干预措施的效果记录在案。然而,当将临床试验中的干预措施应用于实际医疗时,实施的质量至关重要。

相似文献

1
[Risk as a concept and a challenge in health care].[风险作为医疗保健中的一个概念和挑战]
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 1996 Sep 20;116(22):2669-72.
2
[Risk as a concept and challenge in health care].[风险作为医疗保健中的一个概念和挑战]
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 1996 Sep 20;116(22):2673-6.
3
Acute coronary care in the elderly, part I: Non-ST-segment-elevation acute coronary syndromes: a scientific statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association Council on Clinical Cardiology: in collaboration with the Society of Geriatric Cardiology.老年人急性冠脉护理,第一部分:非ST段抬高型急性冠脉综合征:美国心脏协会临床心脏病学委员会为医疗专业人员发布的科学声明:与老年心脏病学会合作制定
Circulation. 2007 May 15;115(19):2549-69. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.182615.
4
[The origin of informed consent].[知情同意的起源]
Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2005 Oct;25(5):312-27.
5
[The precautionary principle: advantages and risks].[预防原则:优势与风险]
J Chir (Paris). 2001 Apr;138(2):68-80.
6
American Society of Clinical Oncology policy statement update: genetic testing for cancer susceptibility.美国临床肿瘤学会政策声明更新:癌症易感性基因检测
J Clin Oncol. 2003 Jun 15;21(12):2397-406. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2003.03.189. Epub 2003 Apr 11.
7
[Defining an ethics for preventive trials].
Bull Soc Pathol Exot. 2008 Apr;101(2):85-9.
8
[20 years of cardiovascular epidemiology. The epidemiologist's viewpoint].[心血管病流行病学20年。流行病学家的观点]
Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique. 1996 Nov;44(6):563-76.
9
The concept of prevention: a good idea gone astray?预防的概念:一个误入歧途的好想法?
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2008 Jul;62(7):580-3. doi: 10.1136/jech.2007.071027.
10
Assessment of the understanding of the risks and benefits of hormone replacement therapy (HRT) in primary care physicians.对基层医疗医生对激素替代疗法(HRT)风险和益处的理解情况的评估。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005 Aug;193(2):551-6; discussion 556-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2005.03.061.