Marmarou A, Foda M A, Bandoh K, Yoshihara M, Yamamoto T, Tsuji O, Zasler N, Ward J D, Young H F
Division of Neurosurgery, Medical College of Virginia, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond 23298, USA.
J Neurosurg. 1996 Dec;85(6):1026-35. doi: 10.3171/jns.1996.85.6.1026.
Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) dynamics were correlated to the changes in ventricular size during the first 3 months posttrauma in patients with severe head injury (Glasgow Coma Scale score < or = 8, 75 patients) to distinguish between atrophy and hydrocephalus as the two possible causes of posttraumatic ventriculomegaly. Using the bolus injection technique, the baseline intracranial pressure (ICP), pressure volume index, and resistance for CSF absorption (R0) provided a three-dimensional profile of CSF dynamics that was correlated with ventricular size and Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) score at 3, 6, and 12 months posttrauma. Patients were separated into five different groups based on changes in ventricular size, presence of atrophy, and CSF dynamics. Group 1 (normal group, 41.3%) demonstrated normal ventricular size and normal ICP. Group 2 (benign intracranial hypertension group, 14.7%) showed normal ventricular size and elevated ICP. Group 3 (atrophy group, 24%) displayed ventriculomegaly, normal ICP, and normal R0. Group 4 (normal-pressure hydrocephalus group, 9.3%) had ventriculomegaly, normal ICP, and high R0. Group 5 (high-pressure hydrocephalus group, 10.7%) showed ventriculomegaly and elevated ICP with or without high R0. The GOS score in the nonhydrocephalic groups (Groups 1, 2, and 3) was better than in the hydrocephalic groups (Groups 4 and 5). It is concluded from these results that 44% of head injury survivors may develop posttraumatic ventriculomegaly. Posttraumatic hydrocephalus, as identified by abnormal CSF dynamics, was diagnosed in 20% of survivors and their outcome was significantly worse. This study demonstrates the importance of using CSF dynamics as an aid in diagnosis of posttraumatic hydrocephalus and identifying those patients who may benefit from shunt placement.
在重度颅脑损伤患者(格拉斯哥昏迷量表评分≤8分,共75例)伤后的前3个月内,研究脑脊液(CSF)动力学与脑室大小变化之间的相关性,以区分萎缩和脑积水这两种创伤后脑室扩大的可能原因。采用团注注射技术,基线颅内压(ICP)、压力容积指数和脑脊液吸收阻力(R0)提供了脑脊液动力学的三维概况,该概况与创伤后3个月、6个月和12个月时的脑室大小及格拉斯哥预后量表(GOS)评分相关。根据脑室大小变化、萎缩情况和脑脊液动力学,将患者分为五个不同组。第1组(正常组,41.3%)脑室大小正常,ICP正常。第2组(良性颅内高压组,14.7%)脑室大小正常,但ICP升高。第3组(萎缩组,24%)出现脑室扩大,ICP正常,R0正常。第4组(正常压力脑积水组,9.3%)有脑室扩大,ICP正常,但R0升高。第5组(高压脑积水组,10.7%)表现为脑室扩大,ICP升高,R0可高或不高。非脑积水组(第1、2和3组)的GOS评分优于脑积水组(第4和5组)。从这些结果得出结论,44%的颅脑损伤幸存者可能会发生创伤后脑室扩大。通过异常脑脊液动力学确定的创伤后脑积水在20%的幸存者中被诊断出来,他们的预后明显更差。本研究证明了利用脑脊液动力学辅助诊断创伤后脑积水以及识别那些可能从分流置管中获益的患者的重要性。