Montgomery S A
Department of Psychiatry, St Mary's Hospital Medical School, London, UK.
Int Clin Psychopharmacol. 1995 Dec;10 Suppl 4:37-45. doi: 10.1097/00004850-199512004-00006.
The clinical trial development programme of mirtazapine (Org 3770), performed in Europe and the United States, demonstrated an outstanding safety profile of this compound. The evaluation of the safety was based on data from all patients who took at least one dose of study medication during studies comparing mirtazapine with placebo, amitriptyline or other active comparators. A general indication of mirtazapine's safety is the significantly lower percentage of patients (65%) who complained of any adverse clinical experiences compared with the placebo- (76%) or amitriptyline-treated group (87%). Moreover, drop-out rates due to adverse clinical experiences were significantly lower than in the amitriptyline-treatment group. Mirtazapine has virtually no anticholinergic, adrenergic or typical selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) side effects. The only significantly higher incidences versus placebo were seen in the adverse clinical effects of drowsiness (23% versus 14%), excessive sedation (19% versus 5%), dry mouth (25% versus 16%), increased appetite (11% versus 2%) and weight increase (10% versus 1%). These complaints were typically mild and transient in nature, and decreased over time despite increased doses of mirtazapine. In contrast, significantly higher incidences of headache (5% versus 10%) and weight decrease (2% versus 6%), symptoms commonly seen in depressed patients, were recorded in the placebo-treated patients. Also, typical SSRI adverse events, such as nausea, vomiting, diarrhoea and insomnia, and symptoms of sexual dysfunction were registered less frequently in mirtazapine-treated patients than in the placebo-treated patients. Approximately 10% of the mirtazapine-treated patients in the clinical trial programme were older than 65 years. The pattern of adverse clinical experiences seen in this group of patients is fully in line with that seen in the overall patient population. The analysis of vital sign indices, i.e. blood pressure and heart rate, showed that no changes occurred with mirtazapine treatment; this pattern was fully comparable to that seen with placebo. Furthermore, very low incidences of clinically relevant changes in laboratory indices, such as the liver enzymes alanine aminotransferase and aspartate aminotransferase or neutropenia, were recorded in each treatment group. Mirtazapine has a very low seizure-inducing potential: only one case was recorded in a patient with a history of seizures during previous treatment with clomipramine. The low seizure-inducing potential combined with a lack of cardiotoxic properties allows safety in an overdose of mirtazapine, even in elderly patients. The only symptom seen in the patients taking an overdose of mirtazapine alone or in combination with other drugs was excessive but transient somnolence, which resolved spontaneously within a few hours. In conclusion, the new antidepressant mirtazapine offers clinicians a unique combination of strong efficacy and good safety.
米氮平(Org 3770)在欧洲和美国开展的临床试验研发项目表明,该化合物具有出色的安全性。安全性评估基于在米氮平与安慰剂、阿米替林或其他活性对照药对比研究中至少服用过一剂研究药物的所有患者的数据。米氮平安全性的一个总体指标是,与安慰剂治疗组(76%)或阿米替林治疗组(87%)相比,主诉有任何不良临床经历的患者比例显著更低(65%)。此外,因不良临床经历导致的退出率显著低于阿米替林治疗组。米氮平几乎没有抗胆碱能、肾上腺素能或典型的选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂(SSRI)的副作用。与安慰剂相比,唯一显著更高的发生率出现在嗜睡(23% 对比14%)、过度镇静(19% 对比5%)、口干(25% 对比16%)、食欲增加(11% 对比2%)和体重增加(10% 对比1%)等不良临床效应方面。这些主诉通常性质轻微且短暂,尽管米氮平剂量增加,但随着时间推移会减少。相比之下,安慰剂治疗的患者中,头痛(5% 对比10%)和体重减轻(2% 对比6%)的发生率显著更高,这些是抑郁症患者常见的症状。此外,米氮平治疗的患者中,典型的SSRI不良事件,如恶心、呕吐、腹泻和失眠以及性功能障碍症状的记录频率低于安慰剂治疗的患者。在临床试验项目中,约10%接受米氮平治疗的患者年龄超过65岁。该组患者出现的不良临床经历模式与总体患者群体完全一致。生命体征指标(即血压和心率)分析表明,米氮平治疗后未发生变化;这种模式与安慰剂所见完全可比。此外,每个治疗组中实验室指标(如肝酶丙氨酸氨基转移酶和天冬氨酸氨基转移酶或中性粒细胞减少症)出现临床相关变化的发生率非常低。米氮平诱发癫痫的可能性非常低:在一名既往用氯米帕明治疗时有癫痫病史的患者中仅记录到一例。诱发癫痫可能性低且缺乏心脏毒性特性使得即使是老年患者过量服用米氮平也具有安全性。单独或与其他药物一起过量服用米氮平的患者中唯一出现的症状是过度但短暂的嗜睡,数小时内可自行缓解。总之,新型抗抑郁药米氮平为临床医生提供了强效疗效和良好安全性的独特组合。