• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

结肠多处穿透伤的前瞻性审计:对一期缝合的进一步支持

Prospective audit of multiple penetrating injuries to the colon: further support for primary closure.

作者信息

Thomson S R, Baker A, Baker L W

机构信息

Department of Surgery, University of Natal Medical School, Durban, South Africa.

出版信息

J R Coll Surg Edinb. 1996 Feb;41(1):20-4.

PMID:8930037
Abstract

Solitary colon injuries are being increasingly managed by intraperitoneal primary closure. The optimal management of the colon wound in multiple injuries of the colon, which have a high mortality, has not been determined. From 1983-1989, 668 patients sustained colonic injuries. In 71 of these patients the colon was injured at more than one site. Of the 597 single injuries to the colon, 472 (79%) were due to stabs and 102 (17%) to gunshot wounds. Sixty-eight men and three women sustained injuries at more than one site in the large intestine. The median age of patients was 26 years (range 13-66). In 61 patients the colon was injured at two sites and in seven patients at three sites. Three patients had more than three sites injured. The injuries were inflicted by: gunshots 35 (49%); stabs, 30 (42%); shotguns, three; and blunt trauma, three. Forty-one patients were treated by intraperitoneal primary closure (IPC) and 30 by a colostomy procedure or exteriorization of the primarily sutured colon (EPSC). Penetrating Abdominal Trauma Index (PATI) scores were high at 32 +/- 6, and were similar for all methods of colon wound management. Twenty-four patients were suffering from shock on admission, 13 of those patients were treated by primary repair and 11 were treated by an exteriorization procedure. Individuals treated by an exteriorization procedure stayed in hospital significantly longer, 45 days versus 21 days (P < 0.004) and had a higher mortality rate, five deaths versus one death (P < 0.04) than those patients who were primarily repaired. Intraperitoneal primary closure of all wounds is the method of choice for the majority of multiple injuries. Colostomy procedures or EPSC contribute to morbidity and mortality.

摘要

孤立性结肠损伤越来越多地通过腹腔内一期缝合进行处理。对于死亡率较高的结肠多处损伤中结肠伤口的最佳处理方法尚未确定。1983年至1989年期间,668例患者遭受结肠损伤。其中71例患者的结肠在不止一个部位受伤。在597例结肠单处损伤中,472例(79%)为刺伤,102例(17%)为枪伤。68名男性和3名女性在大肠的不止一个部位受伤。患者的中位年龄为26岁(范围13 - 66岁)。61例患者的结肠在两个部位受伤,7例患者在三个部位受伤。3例患者有三个以上部位受伤。致伤原因如下:枪伤35例(49%);刺伤30例(42%);霰弹枪伤3例;钝性创伤3例。41例患者采用腹腔内一期缝合(IPC)治疗,30例采用结肠造口术或一期缝合结肠外置术(EPSC)治疗。穿透性腹部创伤指数(PATI)评分较高,为32±6,且所有结肠伤口处理方法的评分相似。24例患者入院时处于休克状态,其中13例患者接受一期修复治疗,11例患者接受外置术治疗。接受外置术治疗的患者住院时间明显更长,分别为45天和21天(P < 0.004),且死亡率更高,分别为5例死亡和1例死亡(P < 0.04),高于接受一期修复治疗的患者。对于大多数多处损伤,所有伤口的腹腔内一期缝合是首选方法。结肠造口术或EPSC会增加发病率和死亡率。

相似文献

1
Prospective audit of multiple penetrating injuries to the colon: further support for primary closure.结肠多处穿透伤的前瞻性审计:对一期缝合的进一步支持
J R Coll Surg Edinb. 1996 Feb;41(1):20-4.
2
A ten-year study of penetrating injuries of the colon.一项关于结肠穿透伤的十年研究。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2004 Dec;47(12):2169-77. doi: 10.1007/s10350-004-0726-5.
3
Identifying the low-risk patient with penetrating colonic injury for selective use of primary repair.识别穿透性结肠损伤的低风险患者以选择性地进行一期修复。
Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1993 Sep;177(3):237-42.
4
Primary repair of 58 consecutive penetrating injuries of the colon: should colostomy be abandoned?连续58例结肠穿透伤的一期修复:是否应摒弃结肠造口术?
Am Surg. 1997 Feb;63(2):170-7.
5
Penetrating colon injuries: exteriorized repair vs. loop colostomy.穿透性结肠损伤:外置修复术与袢式结肠造口术
J Trauma. 1987 Aug;27(8):876-82.
6
A study of the pattern, management and outcome of penetrating colon injuries in Sagamu.萨嘎木地区穿透性结肠损伤的模式、处理及结果研究
Niger J Clin Pract. 2009 Sep;12(3):284-8.
7
Primary repairing in penetrating colon injuries.穿透性结肠损伤的一期修复
Hepatogastroenterology. 1996 Jul-Aug;43(10):819-22.
8
Universal primary colonic repair in the firearm era.火器时代的全结肠一期修复术
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1999 Jan;81(1):58-61.
9
Definitive treatment of colon injuries: a prospective study.结肠损伤的确定性治疗:一项前瞻性研究。
Am Surg. 1993 Jan;59(1):43-9.
10
Penetrating right colon trauma. The ever diminishing role for colostomy.右半结肠穿透伤。结肠造口术的作用日益减小。
Am Surg. 1987 Apr;53(4):209-14.

引用本文的文献

1
The impact of mechanism on the management and outcome of penetrating colonic trauma.机制对穿透性结肠创伤的管理及预后的影响。
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2018 Feb;100(2):152-156. doi: 10.1308/rcsann.2017.0147. Epub 2017 Sep 15.
2
The management of colonic trauma in the damage control era.损伤控制时代结肠创伤的管理
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2017 Jan;99(1):76-81. doi: 10.1308/rcsann.2016.0303. Epub 2016 Sep 23.
3
Surgical management of colorectal injuries: colostomy or primary repair?结直肠损伤的外科处理:结肠造口术还是一期修复?
Tech Coloproctol. 2011 Oct;15 Suppl 1:S63-6. doi: 10.1007/s10151-011-0734-0.
4
Selective conservatism in trauma management: a South African contribution.创伤管理中的选择性保守治疗:南非的贡献。
World J Surg. 2005 Aug;29(8):962-5. doi: 10.1007/s00268-005-0131-9.
5
Aide memoire for the management of gunshot wounds.枪伤处理备忘单
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2002 Jul;84(4):230-3. doi: 10.1308/003588402320439649.
6
Universal primary colonic repair in the firearm era.火器时代的全结肠一期修复术
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1999 Jan;81(1):58-61.
7
Colostomy in conflict: military colonic surgery.冲突中的结肠造口术:军事结肠手术
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1997 Jul;79(4):243-4.