Suppr超能文献

使用乙型肝炎e抗原和乙型肝炎核心抗原IgM抗体的定量检测来监测慢性乙型肝炎的治疗。

Use of quantitative assays for hepatitis B e antigen and IgM antibody to hepatitis B core antigen to monitor therapy in chronic hepatitis B.

作者信息

Hayashi P H, Beames M P, Kuhns M C, Hoofnagle J H, Di Bisceglie A M

机构信息

Liver Diseases Section, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.

出版信息

Am J Gastroenterol. 1996 Nov;91(11):2323-8.

PMID:8931411
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

We evaluated the clinical utility of IgM antibody to the hepatitis B (HB) core antigen (anti-HBc) and HB e antigen (HBeAg) serum levels in patients with chronic HB receiving interferon alfa.

METHODS

Stored serum from 47 patients with chronic HB participating in a controlled trial of interferon alfa therapy (10 million U three times a week for 16 wk) were analyzed. All were seropositive for HB surface Ag, HBeAg, and HB virus (HBV) DNA before entry. IgM anti-HBc index values and HBeAg standard values were determined by automated microparticle enzyme immunoassay on samples drawn just before therapy and 6 months later. Ten normal subjects were tested as controls. IgM anti-HBc and HBeAg levels were compared to initial serum HBV DNA, DNA polymerase, serum aminotransferase levels, and demographic features. Serial IgM anti-HBc levels were also obtained during and after therapy in 10 responders and five nonresponders, and serial HBeAg levels were also obtained during and after therapy in four responders and four nonresponders.

RESULTS

Neither IgM anti-HBc nor HBeAg levels correlated significantly with values for serum HBV DNA, DNA polymerase, aminotransferases, or demographic features. The initial mean IgM anti-HBc level among the 15 responders to therapy (loss of HBeAg and HBV DNA from serum) was no different from that in nonresponders (mean 1.15 vs 1.27, p = not significant). However, the initial mean HBeAg level was significantly lower in responders than in nonresponders (749.4 vs 1356.4, p = 0.019). Among 10 responders, IgM anti-HBc levels decreased progressively over time, so that at latest follow-up (1.5-4 yr later, mean 2.6 yr), the mean had decreased from 1.325 to 0.312 (p = < 0.001). Among five nonresponders, the mean did not change significantly over 1.5-3 yr (mean 2.2 yr) (1.26 vs 1.08, p = not significant). HBeAg values fell in parallel with HBV DNA and DNA polymerase values in four responders tested but remained elevated in four nonresponders.

CONCLUSIONS

HBeAg levels, but not IgM anti-HBc levels, are useful in predicting response to interferon alfa, with responders tending to have lower pretreatment HBeAg levels than nonresponders. HBeAg levels may be used to monitor response to interferon alfa in patients with chronic HB.

摘要

目的

我们评估了慢性乙型肝炎(HB)患者接受干扰素α治疗时,乙型肝炎(HB)核心抗原IgM抗体(抗-HBc)和HBe抗原(HBeAg)血清水平的临床效用。

方法

分析了参与干扰素α治疗对照试验(每周3次,每次1000万单位,共16周)的47例慢性HB患者的储存血清。所有患者在入组前HB表面抗原、HBeAg和HB病毒(HBV)DNA均为血清学阳性。在治疗前和6个月后采集的样本上,通过自动微粒酶免疫测定法测定抗-HBc指数值和HBeAg标准值。检测10名正常受试者作为对照。将抗-HBc IgM和HBeAg水平与初始血清HBV DNA、DNA聚合酶、血清转氨酶水平及人口统计学特征进行比较。在10例应答者和5例无应答者的治疗期间及治疗后,还获取了系列抗-HBc IgM水平,在4例应答者和4例无应答者的治疗期间及治疗后,也获取了系列HBeAg水平。

结果

抗-HBc IgM和HBeAg水平均与血清HBV DNA、DNA聚合酶、转氨酶的值或人口统计学特征无显著相关性。15例治疗应答者(血清中HBeAg和HBV DNA消失)的初始抗-HBc IgM平均水平与无应答者无差异(均值分别为1.15和1.27,p = 无显著性差异)。然而,应答者的初始HBeAg平均水平显著低于无应答者(749.4对1356.4,p = 0.019)。在10例应答者中,抗-HBc IgM水平随时间逐渐下降,因此在最新随访时(1.5 - 4年后,平均2.6年),均值从1.325降至0.312(p = < 0.001)。在5例无应答者中,1.5 - 3年(平均2.2年)内均值无显著变化(1.26对1.08,p = 无显著性差异)。在检测的4例应答者中,HBeAg值与HBV DNA和DNA聚合酶值平行下降,但在4例无应答者中仍保持升高。

结论

HBeAg水平而非抗-HBc IgM水平有助于预测对干扰素α的反应,应答者治疗前的HBeAg水平往往低于无应答者。HBeAg水平可用于监测慢性HB患者对干扰素α的反应。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验