Holohan T V, Handelsman H
Center for Health Care Technology, AHCPR, Rockville, MD 20852, USA.
Health Technol Assess (Rockv). 1996 Sep(10):1-30.
Lung-volume reduction surgery (LVRS) has been proposed as a palliative treatment for selected patients with diffuse emphysema and end-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease who have failed conventional therapy. A number of surgical techniques have been used that are designed to reduce lung volume by surgical resection or laser plication. These techniques are designed to restore previous compromised lung elastic recoil so that expiratory airflow obstruction is reduced, respiratory mechanics are improved, and disabling dyspnea is relieved. Preliminary data derived from both published and unpublished information indicate some favorable short-term benefits. However, objective postoperative data are available for only a small proportion of patients, and long-term followup data are not available. In addition, these surgeries are associated with significant morbidity (and a 6 percent [approximate] surgical mortality) and prolonged hospital stays in a substantial percentage of patients. Patient selection criteria are heterogeneous and in flux, and controversy continues concerning the most appropriate surgical techniques for various categories of patients. The current data do not permit a logical and scientifically defensible conclusion regarding the risks and benefits of LVRS.
肺减容手术(LVRS)已被提议作为一种姑息治疗方法,用于治疗那些常规治疗失败的、患有弥漫性肺气肿和终末期慢性阻塞性肺疾病的特定患者。已经采用了多种手术技术,这些技术旨在通过手术切除或激光折叠来减少肺容积。这些技术旨在恢复先前受损的肺弹性回缩力,从而减少呼气气流阻塞,改善呼吸力学,并缓解致残性呼吸困难。来自已发表和未发表信息的初步数据表明有一些有利的短期益处。然而,仅一小部分患者有术后客观数据,且尚无长期随访数据。此外,这些手术与显著的发病率(约6%的手术死亡率)相关,并且相当一部分患者住院时间延长。患者选择标准各异且不断变化,关于各类患者最合适的手术技术的争议仍在继续。目前的数据无法就肺减容手术的风险和益处得出合乎逻辑且科学合理的结论。