Scarfone D
Sante Ment Que. 1996 Spring;21(1):163-76.
With the ranging debate particularly in the United States regarding the establishment through the path of psychotherapy or psychoanalysis of the reality of traumatic events, the author insists on a rigourous use of the terms of the debate. The Freudian theory, surrounding the concept of psychic reality could not bear only on the unconditional support of either parts: recovered memories/false memories. On the contrary, emphasis must be put on the originality of the concept of psychic reality, which distinguishes itself from both eventful reality and pure imagination. The author underlines the specifically psychoanalytical approach of access to memory, and uses it to criticize notions of recovered memory as well as false memories, while reaffirming what would be a fundamental ethic of psychoanalysis and any other psychotherapy claiming to be inspired by it.
在美国，围绕通过心理治疗或精神分析途径确立创伤性事件现实的广泛辩论中，作者坚持对辩论术语的严格使用。围绕心理现实概念的弗洛伊德理论不能仅仅支持任何一方：恢复的记忆/错误的记忆。相反，必须强调心理现实概念的独特性，它既区别于事件性现实，也区别于纯粹的想象。作者强调了获取记忆的独特精神分析方法，并用它来批评恢复记忆和错误记忆的概念，同时重申了精神分析以及任何声称受其启发的其他心理治疗的基本伦理。
