Suppr超能文献

有氧运动能力良好个体的前臂血管舒缩反应对中心性血容量过多负荷降低。

Diminished forearm vasomotor response to central hypervolemic loading in aerobically fit individuals.

作者信息

Shi X, Gallagher K M, SMith S A, Bryant K H, Raven P B

机构信息

Department of Integrative Physiology, University of North Texas Health Science Center, Fort Worth 76107, USA.

出版信息

Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1996 Nov;28(11):1388-95. doi: 10.1097/00005768-199611000-00007.

Abstract

The aim of this study was to test the hypothesis that cardiopulmonary baroreflex control of forearm vascular resistance (FVR) during central hypervolemic loading was less sensitive in exercise trained high fit individuals (HF) compared to untrained average fit individuals (AF). Eight AF (age: 24 +/- 1 yr and weight: 78.9 +/- 1.7 kg) and eight HF (22 +/- 1 yr 79.5 +/- 2.4 kg) voluntarily participated in the investigation. Maximal aerobic power (determined on a treadmill), plasma volume and blood volume (Evans blue dilution method) were significantly greater in the HF than AF (60.8 +/- 0.7 vs. 41.2 +/- 1.9 ml.kg-1.min-1, 3.96 +/- 0.17 vs 3.36 +/- 0.08 1, and 6.33 +/- 0.23 vs 5.28 +/- 0.13 1). Baseline heart rate (HR), central venous pressure (CVP), mean arterial pressure (MAP, measured by an intraradial catheter or a Finapres finger cuff), forearm blood flow (FBF, plethysmography), and FVR, calculated from the ratio (MAP-CVP)/FBF, were not different between the HF and the AF. Lower body negative pressure (LBNP, -5, -10, -15, and -20 torr) and passive leg elevation (LE, 50 cm) combined with lower body positive pressure (LBPP, +5, +10, and +20 torr) were utilized to elicit central hypovolemia and hypervolemia, respectively. Range of CVP (from LBNP to LE+LBPP) was similar in the AF (from -3.9 to +1.9 mm Hg) and HF (from -4.0 to +2.2 mm Hg). However, FVR/CVP was significantly less in the HF (-1.8 +/- 0.1 unit.mm Hg-1) than AF (-34 +/- 0.1 unit.mm Hg-1). The FVR decrease in response to increase in CVP was significantly diminished in the HF (-1.46 +/- 0.45 unit.mm Hg-1) compared to the AF (-4.40 +/- 0.97 unit.mm Hg-1), and during LBNP induced unloading the FVR/CVP of the HF (-2.01 +/- 0.49 unit.mm Hg-1) was less (P < 0.08) than the AF (-3.28 +/- 0.69 unit.mm Hg-1). We concluded that the cardiopulmonary baroreceptor mediated FVR reflex response was significantly less sensitive to changes in CVP in individuals who practice exercise training.

摘要

本研究的目的是验证以下假设

与未经训练的健康水平一般的个体(AF)相比,运动训练有素的高健康水平个体(HF)在中心血容量过多负荷期间,心肺压力反射对前臂血管阻力(FVR)的控制敏感性较低。8名AF(年龄:24±1岁,体重:78.9±1.7千克)和8名HF(22±1岁,79.5±2.4千克)自愿参与了该研究。HF的最大有氧功率(在跑步机上测定)、血浆量和血容量(伊文思蓝稀释法)显著高于AF(60.8±0.7对41.2±1.9毫升·千克-1·分钟-1、3.96±0.17对3.36±0.08升、6.33±0.23对5.28±0.13升)。HF和AF之间的基线心率(HR)、中心静脉压(CVP)、平均动脉压(MAP,通过桡动脉内导管或Finapres指套测量)、前臂血流量(FBF,体积描记法)以及由(MAP-CVP)/FBF比值计算得出的FVR并无差异。分别采用下体负压(LBNP,-5、-10、-15和-20托)和被动抬腿(LE,50厘米)联合下体正压(LBPP,+5、+10和+20托)来引发中心血容量不足和血容量过多。AF(从-3.9至+1.9毫米汞柱)和HF(从-4.0至+2.2毫米汞柱)的CVP变化范围(从LBNP至LE+LBPP)相似。然而,HF(-1.8±0.1单位·毫米汞柱-1)的FVR/CVP显著低于AF(-34±0.1单位·毫米汞柱-1)。与AF(-4.40±0.97单位·毫米汞柱-1)相比,HF(-1.46±0.45单位·毫米汞柱-1)对CVP升高时FVR降低的反应显著减弱,并且在LBNP诱导的血容量减少期间,HF(-2.01±0.49单位·毫米汞柱-1)的FVR/CVP低于AF(-3.28±0.69单位·毫米汞柱-1)(P<0.08)。我们得出结论,心肺压力感受器介导的FVR反射反应在进行运动训练个体中对CVP变化的敏感性显著较低。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验