Jarvis J G, Greene R N
University of Ottawa, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario, Canada.
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1996 Nov;78(11):1707-12. doi: 10.2106/00004623-199611000-00011.
We retrospectively reviewed the results of use of Wisconsin segmental spinal instrumentation in twenty-four patients who had adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Our purpose was to determine whether there had been any correction of the rotational component. The mean age at the time of the operation was thirteen years and eight months (range, eleven to seventeen years). Computerized tomography was used to measure the degree of vertebral rotation relative to the midline of the body and relative to the mid-sagittal plane in thirty curves that had been treated with instrumentation and in fifteen that had not. According to the criteria of King et al., five patients had a type-I curve; fourteen, a type-II curve; four, a type-III curve; and one, a type-V curve. The mean correction in the coronal plane was 23 degrees (43 per cent; range, 20 to 69 per cent) for the curves that had been treated with instrumentation and 15 degrees (35 per cent; range, 11 to 77 per cent) for those that had not. The mean derotation of the apical vertebra, in relation to the midline of the body, in twenty-two curves that had been treated with instrumentation and that had had a mean initial rotation of 26 degrees (range, 8 to 53 degrees) was 6 degrees (range, 1 to 29 degrees). For seven curves, with a mean initial rotation of 25 degrees (range, 21 to 35 degrees), rotation increased a mean of 3 degrees (range, 1 to 7 degrees) after instrumentation. The rotation of the apical vertebra did not change in one curve treated with instrumentation. Derotation was seen in twelve of the fifteen curves that had not been treated with instrumentation.
我们回顾性分析了24例青少年特发性脊柱侧凸患者使用威斯康星节段性脊柱内固定器械的结果。我们的目的是确定旋转成分是否得到了矫正。手术时的平均年龄为13岁8个月(范围为11至17岁)。采用计算机断层扫描测量了30条接受器械治疗的曲线以及15条未接受器械治疗的曲线中椎体相对于身体中线和相对于矢状面中线的旋转程度。根据金氏等人的标准,5例患者为I型曲线;14例为II型曲线;4例为III型曲线;1例为V型曲线。接受器械治疗的曲线在冠状面的平均矫正角度为23度(43%;范围为20%至69%),未接受器械治疗的曲线为15度(35%;范围为11%至77%)。在22条接受器械治疗且初始平均旋转角度为26度(范围为8至53度)的曲线中,顶椎相对于身体中线的平均去旋转角度为6度(范围为1至29度)。对于7条初始平均旋转角度为25度(范围为21至35度)的曲线,器械治疗后旋转平均增加了3度(范围为1至7度)。1条接受器械治疗的曲线中顶椎旋转未发生变化。在15条未接受器械治疗的曲线中有12条出现了去旋转。