Donner A, Eliasziw M, Klar N
Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Western Ontario, London, Canada.
Biometrics. 1996 Mar;52(1):176-83.
Procedures are compared for testing the homogeneity of k > or = 2 independent kappa statistics in the case of two raters and a dichotomous outcome. One of the procedures is based on the estimated large sample variance derived under a model frequently adopted for inferences concerning interobserver agreement. The other is based on a goodness-of-fit approach to this model. The results of a Monte Carlo simulation show that the two approaches have similar properties if the number of subjects in each sample is large (> 100), and the prevalence of the underlying trait of interest is not extreme, while the goodness-of-fit approach is recommended for comparisons involving smaller numbers of subjects or in which the prevalence of the underlying trait is small (< 0.3).
针对两名评估者和二分结果的情况,比较了用于检验k≥2个独立kappa统计量同质性的方法。其中一种方法基于在常用于关于观察者间一致性推断的模型下得出的估计大样本方差。另一种方法基于对该模型的拟合优度方法。蒙特卡罗模拟结果表明,如果每个样本中的受试者数量较大(>100)且所关注的潜在特征的患病率不极端,则这两种方法具有相似的性质,而拟合优度方法推荐用于涉及较少受试者数量或潜在特征患病率较小(<0.3)的比较。