• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[癌症趋势与医疗保健规划:迈向更好地利用癌症登记处]

[Cancer trends and health care planning: toward a better use of cancer registries].

作者信息

Coleman M P, Lutz J M

机构信息

Thames Cancer Registry, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine.

出版信息

Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique. 1996;44 Suppl 1:S2-6.

PMID:8935858
Abstract

Cancer registries are instruments for cancer surveillance in the whole population. They provide information not only on the current burden of cancer, but--by projection from current occurrence rates and recent trends--on the likely future burden. Cancer risk is increasing in many developed countries, and increasing life expectancy in the next 10-30 years will have a disproportionate effect on the number of cancer patients at advanced ages. Cancer registries are the only type of organisation capable of providing information on cancer in the population as a whole, and of estimating recent trends and future risks of cancer on a national scale. At present, however, cancer registries in France appear not to be used to their full potential for the development of public health strategy. This may be because they have inadequate resources to produce the desired information, or perhaps simply because there is ignorance of their activity and potential. In order to improve the utility of cancer registries, it would be possible to use the British model of establishing service level agreements with the funding authorities. The objectives of such agreements include measures of the quality of data collected, and the extent to which useful information is derived. Simple measures of the volume of research published, while useful, are inadequate as the sole index of activity or criterion for funding. A fresh national strategy is required in France, in order to create a network of efficient cancer registries with stable funding. The long-term benefits in cancer control would be immense.

摘要

癌症登记处是对全体人群进行癌症监测的工具。它们不仅提供有关当前癌症负担的信息,而且通过根据当前发病率和近期趋势进行预测,提供有关未来可能的癌症负担的信息。在许多发达国家,癌症风险正在增加,未来10至30年预期寿命的延长将对老年癌症患者的数量产生不成比例的影响。癌症登记处是唯一能够提供关于全体人群癌症信息,并在国家层面估计癌症近期趋势和未来风险的组织类型。然而,目前法国的癌症登记处似乎并未充分发挥其在制定公共卫生战略方面的潜力。这可能是因为它们缺乏足够的资源来提供所需的信息,或者仅仅是因为对其活动和潜力缺乏了解。为了提高癌症登记处的效用,可以采用英国与资助机构签订服务水平协议的模式。此类协议的目标包括对所收集数据质量的衡量,以及获取有用信息的程度。虽然已发表研究数量的简单衡量标准有用,但作为活动的唯一指标或资助标准是不够的。法国需要一项新的国家战略,以创建一个资金稳定的高效癌症登记处网络。在癌症控制方面的长期益处将是巨大的。

相似文献

1
[Cancer trends and health care planning: toward a better use of cancer registries].[癌症趋势与医疗保健规划:迈向更好地利用癌症登记处]
Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique. 1996;44 Suppl 1:S2-6.
2
Cancer incidence and mortality in France over the period 1978-2000.1978 - 2000年期间法国的癌症发病率和死亡率。
Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique. 2003 Feb;51(1 Pt 1):3-30.
3
The NCI All Ireland Cancer Conference.美国国家癌症研究所全爱尔兰癌症会议。
Oncologist. 1999;4(4):275-277.
4
[Use of population based registries in developing a regional medical program against cancer. Example of the Rhone-Alpes region].[利用基于人群的登记系统制定区域抗癌医疗计划。罗讷-阿尔卑斯大区的实例]
Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique. 1996;44 Suppl 1:S40-5.
5
Annual report to the nation on the status of cancer, 1975-2002, featuring population-based trends in cancer treatment.《1975 - 2002年全国癌症状况年度报告》,重点介绍基于人群的癌症治疗趋势。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2005 Oct 5;97(19):1407-27. doi: 10.1093/jnci/dji289.
6
Cancer prevalence in France: time trend, situation in 2002 and extrapolation to 2012.法国的癌症患病率:时间趋势、2002年的情况及对2012年的推断
Eur J Cancer. 2008 Jan;44(1):115-22. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2007.10.022. Epub 2007 Nov 26.
7
Pilot test for linking population-based cancer registries with CCG/POG pediatric registries.将基于人群的癌症登记处与CCG/POG儿科登记处相链接的试点测试。
J Ky Med Assoc. 2002 May;100(5):195-9.
8
A national framework for cancer surveillance in the United States.美国癌症监测国家框架。
Cancer Causes Control. 2005 Mar;16(2):151-70. doi: 10.1007/s10552-004-3487-5.
9
Lessons of "what-if" thirty years ago in population policy.三十年前人口政策中“如果……将会怎样”的教训。
Dirasat Sukkaniyah. 1984 Apr-Jun;11(69):3-18, [17-21].
10
[The role of cancer registries in the surveillance, epidemiologic research and disease prevention].癌症登记处在监测、流行病学研究和疾病预防中的作用
Bull Cancer. 2003 Oct;90(10):865-71.

引用本文的文献

1
Prevalence of cancer in the elderly: discrepancies between self-reported and registry data.老年人癌症患病率:自我报告数据与登记数据之间的差异。
Br J Cancer. 1997;75(3):445-7. doi: 10.1038/bjc.1997.74.