• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对果糖、葡萄糖、蔗糖和麦芽糖的单一味觉。

Monogeusia for fructose, glucose, sucrose, and maltose.

作者信息

Breslin P A, Beauchamp G K, Pugh E N

机构信息

Monell Chemical Senses Center, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.

出版信息

Percept Psychophys. 1996 Apr;58(3):327-41. doi: 10.3758/bf03206809.

DOI:10.3758/bf03206809
PMID:8935894
Abstract

We investigated the ability of subjects to discriminate sugars with a whole-mouth forced-choice paradigm, in which a standard solution was compared with a test solution of varied concentration. Discrimination probabilities were U-shaped functions of test concentration: for 6 subjects and pairwise combinations of fructose, glucose, and sucrose, discriminability always declined to chance over a narrow range of test concentrations. At concentrations < or = 100 mM, maltose was indiscriminable from fructose but discriminable at higher concentrations for 4 subjects. By analogy with the monochromacy of night vision, whereby any two lights are indiscriminable when their relative intensities are suitably adjusted, we call the gustatory indiscriminability of these sugars monogeusia. The simplest account of monogeusia is that all information about the indiscriminable sugars is represented by a single neural signal that varies only in magnitude. The discriminability of maltose from the other sugars at higher concentrations is consistent with the hypothesis that maltose also activates a second gustatory code.

摘要

我们采用全口强制选择范式研究了受试者区分糖类的能力,在此范式中,将一种标准溶液与不同浓度的测试溶液进行比较。辨别概率是测试浓度的U形函数:对于6名受试者以及果糖、葡萄糖和蔗糖的两两组合,在较窄的测试浓度范围内,辨别能力总是降至随机水平。在浓度≤100 mM时,4名受试者无法区分麦芽糖和果糖,但在较高浓度下可以区分。类比于夜视的单色性,即当任意两束光的相对强度得到适当调整时就无法区分它们,我们将这些糖类的味觉不可区分性称为单味觉。对单味觉最简单的解释是,关于不可区分糖类的所有信息都由仅在幅度上变化的单个神经信号来表示。麦芽糖在较高浓度下与其他糖类的可区分性与麦芽糖也激活第二种味觉编码的假设一致。

相似文献

1
Monogeusia for fructose, glucose, sucrose, and maltose.对果糖、葡萄糖、蔗糖和麦芽糖的单一味觉。
Percept Psychophys. 1996 Apr;58(3):327-41. doi: 10.3758/bf03206809.
2
Gustatory responsiveness to food-associated sugars and acids in pigtail macaques, Macaca nemestrina.豚尾猕猴(食蟹猴)对与食物相关的糖类和酸类的味觉反应。
Physiol Behav. 2000 Sep 15;70(5):495-504. doi: 10.1016/s0031-9384(00)00294-8.
3
Qualitative differences in polysaccharide and sugar tastes in the rat: a two-carbohydrate taste model.大鼠多糖和糖类味觉的质性差异:一种双碳水化合物味觉模型
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 1987 Summer;11(2):187-96. doi: 10.1016/s0149-7634(87)80025-8.
4
An acquired distaste: sugar discrimination by the larval parasitoid Microplitis croceipes (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) is affected by prior sugar exposure.一种后天形成的厌恶:幼虫寄生蜂叉角厉蝽(膜翅目:茧蜂科)对糖的辨别能力受先前糖暴露的影响。
J Exp Biol. 2014 May 15;217(Pt 10):1692-700. doi: 10.1242/jeb.091843. Epub 2014 Feb 13.
5
Carbohydrate taste preferences in rats: glucose, sucrose, maltose, fructose and polycose compared.大鼠对碳水化合物的味觉偏好:葡萄糖、蔗糖、麦芽糖、果糖和多糖的比较
Physiol Behav. 1987;40(5):563-8. doi: 10.1016/0031-9384(87)90097-7.
6
Dietary experience with glucose and fructose fosters heightened avidity for glucose-containing sugars independent of TRPM5 taste transduction in mice.饮食中摄入葡萄糖和果糖会提高小鼠对含葡萄糖糖的偏好,而与 TRPM5 味觉转导无关。
Nutr Neurosci. 2023 Apr;26(4):345-356. doi: 10.1080/1028415X.2022.2050092. Epub 2022 Mar 21.
7
Sucrose to polycose preference shifts in rats: the role of taste, osmolality and the fructose moiety.大鼠中蔗糖至多糖偏好的转变:味觉、渗透压和果糖部分的作用。
Physiol Behav. 1991 Jun;49(6):1047-60. doi: 10.1016/0031-9384(91)90330-q.
8
Sucrose and fructose have qualitatively different flavors to rats.蔗糖和果糖对大鼠来说有着质的不同的味道。
Physiol Behav. 1994 Sep;56(3):549-54. doi: 10.1016/0031-9384(94)90300-x.
9
Is there a generalized sweetness sensitivity for an individual? A psychophysical investigation of inter-individual differences in detectability and discriminability for sucrose and fructose.个体是否存在普遍的甜味敏感度?一项关于蔗糖和果糖可检测性及可辨别性个体间差异的心理物理学研究。
Physiol Behav. 2016 Oct 15;165:239-48. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2016.08.004. Epub 2016 Aug 4.
10
Is sugar as sweet to the palate as seeds are appetizing to the belly? Taste responsiveness to five food-associated carbohydrates in zoo-housed white-faced sakis, Pithecia pithecia.糖对于口腔来说是否和种子对肚子一样有吸引力?动物园中饲养的白面卷尾猴对五种与食物相关的碳水化合物的味觉反应。
PLoS One. 2023 Oct 31;18(10):e0292175. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0292175. eCollection 2023.

引用本文的文献

1
Sweet Taste Adaptation to Sugars, Sucralose, and Their Blends: A Human and Rodent Perspective.对糖类、三氯蔗糖及其混合物的甜味适应:从人类和啮齿动物角度的探讨
Nutrients. 2025 Sep 27;17(19):3075. doi: 10.3390/nu17193075.
2
Sugar type and route of delivery influence insulin and glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide responses in rats.糖类类型和给药途径影响大鼠体内的胰岛素及葡萄糖依赖性促胰岛素多肽反应。
Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2025 Aug 1;329(2):E210-E225. doi: 10.1152/ajpendo.00460.2024. Epub 2025 Jun 25.
3
Selective increases in taste sensitivity to glucose as a function of hunger status.

本文引用的文献

1
Single sweetness signal.单一甜味信号
Nature. 1994 Jun 9;369(6480):447-8. doi: 10.1038/369447a0.
2
Multiple receptor sites mediate sweetness: evidence from cross adaptation.多个受体位点介导甜味:来自交叉适应的证据。
Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 1981 Sep;15(3):377-88. doi: 10.1016/0091-3057(81)90266-5.
3
Studies on the perception of taste: do primaries exist?味觉感知研究:是否存在基本味觉?
味觉对葡萄糖的敏感性随饥饿状态而选择性增加。
Appetite. 2025 Mar 1;207:107901. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2025.107901. Epub 2025 Feb 9.
4
The elusive cephalic phase insulin response: triggers, mechanisms, and functions. elusive cephalic phase insulin response: triggers, mechanisms, and functions.
Physiol Rev. 2023 Apr 1;103(2):1423-1485. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00025.2022. Epub 2022 Nov 24.
5
Dietary experience with glucose and fructose fosters heightened avidity for glucose-containing sugars independent of TRPM5 taste transduction in mice.饮食中摄入葡萄糖和果糖会提高小鼠对含葡萄糖糖的偏好,而与 TRPM5 味觉转导无关。
Nutr Neurosci. 2023 Apr;26(4):345-356. doi: 10.1080/1028415X.2022.2050092. Epub 2022 Mar 21.
6
Evidence supporting oral sensitivity to complex carbohydrates independent of sweet taste sensitivity in humans.支持人类对复合碳水化合物存在口腔敏感性且独立于甜味敏感性的证据。
PLoS One. 2017 Dec 27;12(12):e0188784. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0188784. eCollection 2017.
7
Behavioral evidence that select carbohydrate stimuli activate T1R-independent receptor mechanisms.选择碳水化合物刺激物激活 T1R 独立受体机制的行为证据。
Appetite. 2018 Mar 1;122:26-31. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2016.12.031. Epub 2016 Dec 26.
8
Salivary Amylase: Digestion and Metabolic Syndrome.唾液淀粉酶:消化与代谢综合征
Curr Diab Rep. 2016 Oct;16(10):102. doi: 10.1007/s11892-016-0794-7.
9
Behavioral Evidence for More than One Taste Signaling Pathway for Sugars in Rats.大鼠中糖存在多种味觉信号传导途径的行为学证据。
J Neurosci. 2016 Jan 6;36(1):113-24. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3356-15.2016.
10
An evolutionary perspective on food and human taste.从进化角度看食物与人类味觉
Curr Biol. 2013 May 6;23(9):R409-18. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2013.04.010.
Physiol Behav. 1982 Jan;28(1):57-62. doi: 10.1016/0031-9384(82)90102-0.
4
Qualitative differences in polysaccharide and sugar tastes in the rat: a two-carbohydrate taste model.大鼠多糖和糖类味觉的质性差异:一种双碳水化合物味觉模型
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 1987 Summer;11(2):187-96. doi: 10.1016/s0149-7634(87)80025-8.
5
The pi mechanisms of W S Stiles: an historical review.
Perception. 1986;15(6):705-28. doi: 10.1068/p150705.
6
Extrageniculate vision in hemianopic humans: saccade inhibition by signals in the blind field.
Science. 1990 Oct 5;250(4977):118-21. doi: 10.1126/science.2218503.
7
Monochromatism determined at a long-wavelength/middle-wavelength cone-antagonistic locus.在长波长/中波长视锥细胞拮抗位点测定的全色盲。
Vision Res. 1992 Dec;32(12):2349-67. doi: 10.1016/0042-6989(92)90098-4.