• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

当社会工作者与医生合作时:积极和消极的跨学科体验。

When social workers and physicians collaborate: positive and negative interdisciplinary experiences.

作者信息

Abramson J S, Mizrahi T

机构信息

School of Social Welfare, University at Albany, State University of New York 12222, USA.

出版信息

Soc Work. 1996 May;41(3):270-81.

PMID:8936083
Abstract

Interdisciplinary collaboration is becoming increasingly important as the current complexity and cost of health care require an efficient and well-coordinated service delivery system. To understand the factors contributing to positive and negative collaboration, 53 social workers and 50 physicians in 12 hospital settings were interviewed about their best and worst experiences collaborating on a case. Thirty precoded items were classified into three constructs that reflect aspects of collaboration related to the case, to interaction between collaborators, and to the competence of the collaborator. Differences between the two professions were greatest on the interactional factors, with social workers valuing them much more than physicians did. Communication appeared to be the only intrinsic or universal aspect of collaboration equally important to both groups in both types of cases. Implications for social work practice and leadership are discussed.

摘要

随着当前医疗保健的复杂性和成本要求建立一个高效且协调良好的服务提供系统,跨学科合作正变得越来越重要。为了了解促成积极和消极合作的因素,研究人员对12家医院的53名社会工作者和50名医生进行了访谈,询问他们在一个病例上合作的最佳和最差经历。30个预先编码的项目被分为三个结构,这些结构反映了与病例相关的合作方面、合作者之间的互动方面以及合作者的能力方面。在互动因素上,两个专业之间的差异最大,社会工作者比医生更重视这些因素。在两类病例中,沟通似乎是合作中对两组同样重要的唯一内在或普遍方面。文中还讨论了对社会工作实践和领导力的启示。

相似文献

1
When social workers and physicians collaborate: positive and negative interdisciplinary experiences.当社会工作者与医生合作时:积极和消极的跨学科体验。
Soc Work. 1996 May;41(3):270-81.
2
Collaboration between social workers and physicians: perspectives on a shared case.社会工作者与医生之间的合作:关于一个共同案例的观点
Soc Work Health Care. 2000;31(3):1-24. doi: 10.1300/J010v31n03_01.
3
Do all health and social care professionals interact equally: a study of interactions in multidisciplinary teams in the United Kingdom.所有健康与社会照护专业人员的互动是否平等:对英国多学科团队互动情况的一项研究。
Scand J Caring Sci. 2005 Sep;19(3):268-73. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-6712.2005.00338.x.
4
Working together for better health.
Nurs J India. 2006 Nov;97(11):257-8.
5
Interdisciplinary relationships between chaplains and social workers in health care settings.医疗保健环境中牧师与社会工作者之间的跨学科关系。
J Health Care Chaplain. 2009;16(1-2):13-23. doi: 10.1080/08854720903451048.
6
Interprofessional collaboration within Canadian integrative healthcare clinics: Key components.加拿大综合医疗诊所内的跨专业协作:关键组成部分。
Soc Sci Med. 2009 Sep;69(5):707-15. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.05.048. Epub 2009 Jul 14.
7
Impact of clinical leadership development on the clinical leader, nursing team and care-giving process: a case study.临床领导力发展对临床领导者、护理团队及护理过程的影响:一项案例研究
J Nurs Manag. 2008 Sep;16(6):753-63. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2834.2008.00930.x.
8
Understanding collaboration between social workers and physicians: application of a typology.理解社会工作者与医生之间的合作:一种类型学的应用
Soc Work Health Care. 2003;37(2):71-100. doi: 10.1300/J010v37n02_04.
9
Inside the interdisciplinary team experiences of hospice social workers.临终关怀社会工作者在跨学科团队中的经历。
J Soc Work End Life Palliat Care. 2006;2(3):7-21. doi: 10.1300/J457v02n03_03.
10
Interdisciplinary teamwork: is the influence of emotional intelligence fully appreciated?跨学科团队合作:情商的影响是否得到了充分认识?
J Nurs Manag. 2007 May;15(4):386-91. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2834.2007.00711.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Family physician service quality and sustainability: a roadmap for Pakistan's healthcare sector.家庭医生服务质量与可持续性:巴基斯坦医疗保健部门的路线图。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2024 Dec 5;11:1455807. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1455807. eCollection 2024.
2
Views on Interprofessional Collaboration in a Dutch Sexual Assault Center: A Qualitative Study Among Workers.荷兰一家性侵犯中心对跨专业合作的看法:一项针对工作人员的定性研究
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2023 Jul 17;16:2001-2012. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S416996. eCollection 2023.
3
Community case managers' challenges collaborating with primary care when managing complex patients in the community: A qualitative study in Singapore.
社区病例管理者在社区中管理复杂患者时与初级保健合作面临的挑战:新加坡的一项定性研究。
Health Soc Care Community. 2022 Jul;30(4):1568-1577. doi: 10.1111/hsc.13489. Epub 2021 Jul 12.
4
A new model for delivering care for lower urinary tract symptoms.一种治疗下尿路症状的新型护理模式。
Can Urol Assoc J. 2019 Jun;13(6):203-207. doi: 10.5489/cuaj.5532.
5
Interprofessional Teamwork and Collaboration Between Community Health Workers and Healthcare Teams: An Integrative Review.社区卫生工作者与医疗团队之间的跨专业团队合作与协作:一项综合综述。
Health Serv Res Manag Epidemiol. 2015 Mar 16;2:2333392815573312. doi: 10.1177/2333392815573312. eCollection 2015 Jan-Dec.
6
The critical role of social workers in home-based primary care.社会工作者在家庭初级保健中的关键作用。
Soc Work Health Care. 2014;53(4):330-43. doi: 10.1080/00981389.2014.884041.
7
What makes or breaks provider-researcher collaborations in HIV research? A mixed method analysis of providers' willingness to partner.是什么促成或打破了 HIV 研究中提供者-研究人员的合作?对提供者合作意愿的混合方法分析。
Health Educ Behav. 2013 Apr;40(2):223-30. doi: 10.1177/1090198112447616. Epub 2012 Sep 14.
8
Community perspectives on factors that influence collaboration in public health research.社区对影响公共卫生研究合作因素的看法。
Health Educ Behav. 2009 Oct;36(5):930-47. doi: 10.1177/1090198108328328. Epub 2009 Feb 5.
9
Researchers' experiences, positive and negative, in integrative landscape projects.研究人员在综合景观项目中的经历,包括正面和负面的经历。
Environ Manage. 2005 Dec;36(6):792-807. doi: 10.1007/s00267-005-0038-0.