Pinto Rogério M
Columbia University School of Social Work, New York, New York, USA.
Health Educ Behav. 2009 Oct;36(5):930-47. doi: 10.1177/1090198108328328. Epub 2009 Feb 5.
Community collaboration in research may lead to better methods, results, and dissemination of interventions. Little systematic research has examined specific factors that influence community-based organizations (CBOs) to collaborate in public health research. There is an urgent need to advance knowledge on this topic so that together, researchers and CBOs can minimize barriers to collaboration. This study advances a CBOfocused characterization of collaboration in HIV-prevention research. By focusing on the perspectives of 20 key informants in 10 HIV-prevention CBOs, qualitative data revealed factors that influenced their collaborations in four domains: (a) Researchers' Characteristics (expertise, availability), (b) Collaborative Research Characteristics (ought to improve services and CBO infrastructure); (c) Community Partner-Researcher Relationships (resolving social and professional issues); and (d) Barriers to HIV-Prevention Research Collaboration (cultural and social disconnect between CBO and academia). To reduce barriers, researchers ought to enhance motivators that facilitate collaboration. To use the advantages of community-based research, prevention scientists and policy makers ought to embrace CBOs' characterization of what makes health research genuinely collaborative.
研究中的社区合作可能会带来更好的方法、结果以及干预措施的传播。很少有系统的研究考察影响社区组织(CBO)参与公共卫生研究合作的具体因素。迫切需要增进对这一主题的了解,以便研究人员和社区组织能够共同减少合作障碍。本研究推进了对以社区组织为重点的艾滋病毒预防研究合作的描述。通过关注10个艾滋病毒预防社区组织中20位关键信息提供者的观点,定性数据揭示了影响他们在四个领域合作的因素:(a)研究人员的特征(专业知识、可及性);(b)合作研究的特征(应改善服务和社区组织基础设施);(c)社区合作伙伴与研究人员的关系(解决社会和专业问题);以及(d)艾滋病毒预防研究合作的障碍(社区组织与学术界之间的文化和社会脱节)。为了减少障碍,研究人员应增强促进合作的动力因素。为了利用基于社区研究的优势,预防科学家和政策制定者应接受社区组织对使健康研究真正具有合作性的因素的描述。