Thiel A, Hoff P, Scherbaum N
Department of Medical Psychology and Psychotherapy, University of Innsbruck, Austria.
Psychopathology. 1996;29(5):285-91. doi: 10.1159/000285009.
The present study reports results of the ICD-10 research criteria trial concerning the diagnosis of affective disorders (section F3). On the basis of written case reports and videotapes a total of 451 clinicians from 34 centres in German-speaking countries prepared 2.228 diagnostic ratings on 39 different psychiatric patients. Three of the 39 cases met the diagnostic criteria for affective disorders, and 248 of the diagnostic assessments referred to these cases. The majority of clinicians rated the reliability, the ease and the suitability of the diagnostic criteria positively. The reliability of the affective disorders was extremely good, with a kappa of 0.93 in the range of 2-character diagnoses. The reliability of the 3-character categories was much smaller: Kappa values for depressive episode (F31) and recurrent depressive disorder (F33) were 0.68 and 0.54, respectively. The lowest concordance had a kappa value of 0.22 and was found in the case report of dysthymia (F34.1). Therefore a more precise definition of the diagnostic criteria for dysthymia would be desirable.
本研究报告了关于情感障碍(F3章节)诊断的国际疾病分类第十版(ICD - 10)研究标准试验的结果。基于书面病例报告和录像带,来自德语国家34个中心的451名临床医生对39名不同的精神科患者进行了2228次诊断评级。39例病例中有3例符合情感障碍的诊断标准,248次诊断评估涉及这些病例。大多数临床医生对诊断标准的可靠性、易用性和适用性给予了积极评价。情感障碍的可靠性非常好,在两位编码诊断范围内,kappa值为0.93。三位编码类别的可靠性要小得多:抑郁发作(F31)和复发性抑郁障碍(F33)的kappa值分别为0.68和0.54。最低的一致性kappa值为0.22,出现在恶劣心境障碍(F34.1)的病例报告中。因此,恶劣心境障碍的诊断标准需要更精确的定义。