Paulson M J, Schwemer G T, Afifi A A, Bendel R B
J Clin Psychol. 1977 Jul;33(3):848-54. doi: 10.1002/1097-4679(197707)33:3<848::aid-jclp2270330351>3.0.co;2-o.
Attitudes toward child rearing and early experiences in childhood traditionally have been regarded as psychodynamic factors that influence adult behavior. The present study assessed the capacity of the Parent Attitude Research Instrument (PARI) to differentiate between court-identified abusive mothers and a control sample of nonabusive, well-baby clinic mothers of comparable socioeconomic status. While univariate t-tests showed statistical significance for 3 of the 23 PARI scales, more sophisticated and appropriate multivariate tests (Discriminant Function Analysis) demonstrated that the PARI correctly classified the experimental and control Ss only 65% of the time. It appears that the PARI alone should not be used to identify potentially abusive mothers. Even more important, the results caution and alert non-statistically informed clinicians and researchers to the pitfall of over-interpreting clinical data that are based on the more simple univariate tests of statistical significance.
传统上,对育儿的态度和童年早期经历被视为影响成人行为的心理动力学因素。本研究评估了父母态度研究工具(PARI)区分经法庭认定的虐待型母亲与社会经济地位相当的非虐待型健康婴儿诊所母亲对照组的能力。虽然单变量t检验显示在PARI的23个量表中有3个具有统计学意义,但更复杂且合适的多变量检验(判别函数分析)表明,PARI仅在65%的时间里正确分类了实验组和对照组的研究对象。看来,仅使用PARI不足以识别潜在的虐待型母亲。更重要的是,研究结果提醒那些不具备统计学知识的临床医生和研究人员,要警惕过度解读基于更简单的单变量统计学意义检验的临床数据所带来的陷阱。