Orhon Filiz Simsek, Ulukol Betul, Bingoler Bahar, Gulnar Sevgi Baskan
Ankara University, School of Medicine, Department of Social Pediatrics, Ankara, Turkey.
Child Abuse Negl. 2006 Oct;30(10):1081-92. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2006.04.004. Epub 2006 Sep 28.
The aims of the study were to: determine the attitudes of parents, pediatric residents, and medical students from a Turkish population toward childhood disciplinary methods; ascertain the association of participants' abusive childhood history with their attitudes toward discipline; and assess their attitudes about disciplinary actions, which should be reported as abuse.
A cross-sectional survey was conducted in Ankara University School of Medicine, Department of Social Pediatrics. Sixty-five parents, 39 pediatric residents, and 106 medical students completed a questionnaire (Survey of Standards of Discipline). This questionnaire was designed to measure sociodemographic characteristics, attitudes toward childhood disciplinary practices, and abusive childhood experiences. There were 43 different disciplinary acts in this questionnaire. The participants were expected to give responses to these acts in three categories: (a) acceptable as discipline; (b) unacceptable as discipline; and (c) unacceptable as discipline-would report to authorities as child abuse. Based on the responses to this questionnaire, we developed the Severity Scale. Using this scale, physical severity scores, verbal severity scores, and total severity scores were measured for each participant.
None of the participants accepted life-threatening practices as discipline, but some declared certain abusive disciplinary practices as acceptable. Some forceful disciplinary methods were not considered as reportable by participants. All severity scores of both residents and students were found to be higher than those of the parents (for verbal severity scores p=.042). Also, both verbal and physical severity scores of parents with one child were higher than those of parents with two children (for verbal severity scores p=.044). Ninety-one participants (43.3%) indicated that beating was an acceptable form of discipline. Of parents, 66.9% reported abusive childhood history by their own criteria. Of medical students with an abusive childhood experience, 56.5% accepted beating as appropriate (p=.001). Both verbal and physical severity scores were found to be higher in participants with abusive childhood history.
Abusive childhood history and lack of education regarding appropriate discipline techniques are linked to the acceptance of certain physical discipline practices. Turkey's cultural and traditional norms may be associated with the use of physical punishment, and in some cases, physical abuse. The lack of awareness of abusive discipline methods among physicians constitutes problems for child protection and must be addressed. Thus, educational programs on child disciplinary practices are required to provide an increased awareness of child abuse among health professional trainees and parents in Turkey.
本研究的目的是:确定来自土耳其人群的父母、儿科住院医师和医学生对儿童管教方法的态度;确定参与者童年时期受虐待的经历与其对管教态度之间的关联;并评估他们对应作为虐待行为报告的管教行为的态度。
在安卡拉大学医学院社会儿科学系进行了一项横断面调查。65名父母、39名儿科住院医师和106名医学生完成了一份问卷(管教标准调查问卷)。该问卷旨在测量社会人口学特征、对儿童管教做法的态度以及童年时期受虐待的经历。该问卷中有43种不同的管教行为。参与者需要对这些行为在三个类别中做出回答:(a) 作为管教可接受;(b) 作为管教不可接受;(c) 作为管教不可接受且会作为虐待儿童行为向当局报告。根据对该问卷的回答,我们制定了严重程度量表。使用该量表,为每位参与者测量身体严重程度得分、言语严重程度得分和总严重程度得分。
没有参与者将危及生命的做法视为可接受的管教方式,但一些人宣称某些虐待性管教做法是可接受的。一些强硬的管教方法未被参与者视为应报告的行为。发现住院医师和医学生的所有严重程度得分均高于父母(言语严重程度得分p = 0.042)。此外,有一个孩子的父母的言语和身体严重程度得分均高于有两个孩子的父母(言语严重程度得分p = 0.044)。91名参与者(43.3%)表示殴打是一种可接受的管教形式。在父母中,66.9% 根据自己的标准报告有童年受虐待的经历。在有童年受虐待经历的医学生中,56.5% 认为殴打是合适的(p = 0.001)。发现有童年受虐待经历的参与者的言语和身体严重程度得分均较高。
童年受虐待的经历以及缺乏关于适当管教技巧的教育与接受某些体罚做法有关。土耳其的文化和传统规范可能与体罚的使用有关,在某些情况下还与身体虐待有关。医生对虐待性管教方法缺乏认识给儿童保护带来了问题,必须加以解决。因此,需要开展关于儿童管教做法的教育项目,以提高土耳其卫生专业学员和家长对虐待儿童行为的认识。