Gulbin J P, Fell J W, Gaffney P T
Faculty of Nursing & School of Health Sciences Griffith University, Gold Coast, Australia.
Aust J Sci Med Sport. 1996 Sep;28(3):86-90.
The physiological profiles and proficiency of 32 volunteer surf life savers (LS), 15 professional lifeguards (LG), and 8 elite surf ironmen (IM) aged from 18 to 44 were compared. Measurements included anthropometry, muscular power, muscular strength-endurance, flexibility, VO2max, maximum heart rate, peak blood lactate response and proficiency in 3 rescue simulations. Both LG and IM were significantly faster than LS in all rescue simulations. IM had significantly greater VO2max (68.6 ml.kg-1.min-1) than LS (56.3) and LG (57.9). IM had significantly lower heart rates than LS after maximal swimming and running, and significantly lower blood lactate 3 minutes post swim (8.4 mmol/L) in comparison with LS (14.0) and LG (12.2). LG obtained better results than LS in 2 of the 3 muscular strength-endurance tasks. It is concluded that: LG and IM are significantly faster in aquatic rescue simulations than LS; IM have greater aerobic capacities than both other groups; the majority of Australian LS have adequate fitness and aquatic skills for surf rescue, although a small subset of LS do not. This group of poorly performing LS are not identified by current surf rescue screening procedures.
比较了32名年龄在18至44岁之间的志愿冲浪救生员(LS)、15名专业救生员(LG)和8名精英冲浪铁人(IM)的生理特征和技能水平。测量内容包括人体测量学、肌肉力量、肌肉力量耐力、柔韧性、最大摄氧量、最大心率、峰值血乳酸反应以及在3次救援模拟中的技能水平。在所有救援模拟中,LG和IM都明显比LS快。IM的最大摄氧量(68.6毫升·千克⁻¹·分钟⁻¹)明显高于LS(56.3)和LG(57.9)。在最大游泳和跑步后,IM的心率明显低于LS,且在游泳后3分钟时,其血乳酸水平(8.4毫摩尔/升)明显低于LS(14.0)和LG(12.2)。在3项肌肉力量耐力任务中的2项中,LG的成绩比LS好。研究得出结论:在水上救援模拟中,LG和IM明显比LS快;IM的有氧能力比其他两组都强;大多数澳大利亚LS具备足够的体能和水上技能进行冲浪救援,不过有一小部分LS不具备。目前的冲浪救援筛查程序无法识别这组表现不佳的LS。