Reinhold P, Genicot B, Close R, Lekeux P
Federal Institute for Health Protection of Consumers and Veterinary Medicine, Jena, Germany.
Res Vet Sci. 1996 Nov;61(3):227-30. doi: 10.1016/s0034-5288(96)90068-5.
Monofrequency forced oscillometry (MFO) using a sinusoidal test signal of one frequency (10 Hz) was compared with the classical pulmonary function technique (using an oesophageal balloon with airflow measurements) in two breeds of cattle which differ in their respiratory physiology, particularly to assess changes in upper airway resistance. Six healthy male Friesian calves (mean [SD] bodyweight 131 [12] kg) and six healthy male blue Belgian calves (mean [SD] bodyweight 137 [13] kg) were examined successively with their heads either in a normal position or held vertically, using a cross-over study design. In the normal position, higher resistances, a higher respiratory impedance, and lower values of the dynamic lung compliance (Cdyn) were measured in the blue Belgian than in the Friesian calves. In the vertical head position, total pulmonary resistance (RL) increased and Cdyn decreased significantly (P < 0.05). The changes in MFO-derived parameters were in accordance with the changes in classical parameters, and for both methods, the percentage changes were markedly higher in the blue Belgian calves.
在两种呼吸生理存在差异的牛品种中,将使用单一频率(10赫兹)正弦测试信号的单频强迫振荡法(MFO)与经典肺功能技术(使用带气流测量的食管气囊)进行比较,特别是为了评估上呼吸道阻力的变化。采用交叉研究设计,先后对6头健康的雄性弗里斯兰犊牛(平均[标准差]体重131[12]千克)和6头健康的雄性蓝色比利时犊牛(平均[标准差]体重137[13]千克)进行检查,检查时它们的头部要么处于正常位置,要么垂直抬起。在正常位置时,与弗里斯兰犊牛相比,蓝色比利时犊牛的阻力更高、呼吸阻抗更高、动态肺顺应性(Cdyn)值更低。在头部垂直位置时,总肺阻力(RL)增加,Cdyn显著降低(P<0.05)。MFO得出的参数变化与经典参数的变化一致,并且对于这两种方法,蓝色比利时犊牛的百分比变化明显更高。