Suppr超能文献

可触及乳腺病变的细针穿刺抽吸与切割活检的比较。

Comparison of fine needle aspiration and Tru-Cut biopsy of palpable mammary lesions.

作者信息

Scopa C D, Koukouras D, Spiliotis J, Harkoftakis J, Koureleas S, Kyriakopoulou D, Tzoracoleftherakis E

机构信息

Department of Surgical Pathology, University of Patras Medical School, Greece.

出版信息

Cancer Detect Prev. 1996;20(6):620-4.

PMID:8939348
Abstract

To assess the accuracy and predictive value of fine-needle aspiration (FNA) cytology and Tru-Cut needle biopsy of palpable breast lesions, we studied 215 aspirates obtained from 209 patients and 120 tissue-core biopsies taken from 109 patients. The FNA and Tru-Cut findings have been grouped as benign, malignant, suspicious, and nondiagnostic. Histologic confirmation was obtained in 103 aspirated and 102 biopsied cases. Considering only cases with a definitive benign or malignant diagnosis, the accuracy of FNA was 94%, while the sensitivity and specificity were 90 and 100%, respectively. The predictive value of a positive diagnosis (PV+) was 100% and the predictive value of a negative diagnosis (PV-) was 86%. Likewise, the accuracy of Tru-Cut needle biopsy was 90% while the sensitivity and specificity were 89 and 100%, respectively. The PV+ was 100%, and the PV- was 58%. Our study suggests that FNA cytology of the breast is a reliable diagnostic procedure and it should always be included in the preoperative diagnosis of breast tumors.

摘要

为评估细针穿刺(FNA)细胞学检查及对可触及乳腺病变进行Tru-Cut针活检的准确性和预测价值,我们研究了209例患者的215份穿刺样本以及109例患者的120份组织芯活检样本。FNA和Tru-Cut检查结果分为良性、恶性、可疑及无法诊断四类。103例穿刺病例和102例活检病例获得了组织学确诊。仅考虑确诊为良性或恶性的病例,FNA的准确率为94%,敏感性和特异性分别为90%和100%。阳性诊断预测值(PV+)为100%,阴性诊断预测值(PV-)为86%。同样,Tru-Cut针活检的准确率为90%,敏感性和特异性分别为89%和100%。PV+为100%,PV-为58%。我们的研究表明,乳腺FNA细胞学检查是一种可靠的诊断方法,应始终纳入乳腺肿瘤的术前诊断。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验