Trajanoski Z, Brunner G A, Gfrerer R J, Wach P, Pieber T R
Department of Biophysics, Graz University of Technology, Austria.
Diabetes Care. 1996 Dec;19(12):1412-5. doi: 10.2337/diacare.19.12.1412.
To evaluate the accuracy of home blood glucose meters during hypoglycemia.
Six blood glucose meters-One Touch II (LifeScan, Milpitas, CA), Companion II (Medisense, Cambridge, U.K.), Reflolux (Boehringer Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany), Accutrend (Boehringer Mannheim), Elite (Bayer, Munich, Germany), and HemoCue (HemoCue, Angelholm, Sweden)-were compared with a reference method (Beckman Glucose Analyzer 2). Glucose concentrations from arterialized venous blood samples were measured using all glucose meters (whole blood) and the reference method (plasma) during hypoglycemic-hyperinsulinemic clamps in 15 subjects.
In total, 663 blood glucose monitor readings and 119 reference values ranging from 2.28 to 3.89 mmol/l were analyzed. The correlation coefficients and the percentage of measurements within 20% and outside 40% of the reference values for each glucose meter were as follows: One Touch II: 0.91, 99.2% and 0%; Companion II: 0.81, 88.2% and 2.5%; Reflolux: 0.78, 85.0% and 0.9%; Accutrend: 0.88, 46.0% and 6.6%; Elite: 0.78, 75.6% and 4.2%; and HemoCue: 0.93, 96.6% and 0% (P < 0.001).
There were substantial differences between the blood glucose meters during hypoglycemia, and none of the devices met the latest criteria recommended by the American Diabetes Association.
评估家用血糖仪在低血糖期间的准确性。
将六种血糖仪——One Touch II(美国加利福尼亚州米尔皮塔斯的LifeScan公司)、Companion II(英国剑桥的Medisense公司)、Reflolux(德国曼海姆的勃林格殷格翰公司)、Accutrend(勃林格殷格翰公司)、Elite(德国慕尼黑的拜耳公司)和HemoCue(瑞典安吉尔霍尔姆的HemoCue公司)——与一种参考方法(贝克曼葡萄糖分析仪2)进行比较。在15名受试者进行低血糖-高胰岛素钳夹试验期间,使用所有血糖仪(全血)和参考方法(血浆)测量动脉化静脉血样本中的葡萄糖浓度。
总共分析了663次血糖仪读数和119个范围在2.28至3.89 mmol/l的参考值。每种血糖仪的相关系数以及测量值在参考值的20%以内和40%以外的百分比分别如下:One Touch II:0.91、99.2%和0%;Companion II:0.81、88.2%和2.5%;Reflolux:0.78、85.0%和0.9%;Accutrend:0.88、46.0%和6.6%;Elite:0.78、75.6%和4.2%;HemoCue:0.93、96.6%和0%(P<0.001)。
低血糖期间血糖仪之间存在显著差异,且没有一种设备符合美国糖尿病协会推荐的最新标准。