Timbo B B, Street D, Headrick M, Wilcox T, Klontz K
Epidemiology Branch, Food and Drug Administration, Washington, DC 20204, USA.
Tex Med. 1996 Nov;92(11):52-6.
We used the 1993 Texas Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System survey to assess the prevalence of raw shellfish consumption and to find the demographic and behavioral characteristics of raw shellfish consumers. We studied the general impact of warning labels reported by survey respondents. Data were analyzed using univariate and multiple logistic regression methods. Fourteen percent of the Texas surveyed reported consuming raw shellfish. Respondents with incomes greater than or equal to $25,000 and with education beyond high school were more likely to report consuming raw shellfish than were those with incomes less than $25,000 and with high school diplomas or less. Respondents at risk for acute and chronic drinking, driving while intoxicated, and driving without a seat belt were more likely than those not at risk of these behaviors to report consumption of raw shellfish. We did not find a significant difference between eaters and noneaters of raw shellfish regarding the impact of warning labels: however, among eaters of raw shellfish, older respondents were more likely than younger respondents to report that warning labels had no effect on them.
我们利用1993年得克萨斯州行为风险因素监测系统的调查来评估食用生贝类的流行情况，并找出食用生贝类者的人口统计学和行为特征。我们研究了调查对象报告的警示标签的总体影响。数据采用单变量和多因素逻辑回归方法进行分析。在接受调查的得克萨斯州人中，14%报告食用生贝类。收入大于或等于25000美元且受过高中以上教育的调查对象比收入低于25000美元且只有高中文凭或更低学历的调查对象更有可能报告食用生贝类。有急性和慢性饮酒、醉酒驾车以及不系安全带驾车风险的调查对象比没有这些行为风险的调查对象更有可能报告食用生贝类。我们没有发现食用生贝类者和不食用者在警示标签影响方面存在显著差异：然而，在食用生贝类者中，年长的调查对象比年轻的调查对象更有可能报告警示标签对他们没有影响。
