• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

粪便潜血试验筛查结直肠癌的随机研究。

Randomised study of screening for colorectal cancer with faecal-occult-blood test.

作者信息

Kronborg O, Fenger C, Olsen J, Jørgensen O D, Søndergaard O

机构信息

Department of Surgery A, Odense University Hospital, Denmark.

出版信息

Lancet. 1996 Nov 30;348(9040):1467-71. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(96)03430-7.

DOI:10.1016/S0140-6736(96)03430-7
PMID:8942774
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Case-control studies and a voluntary-based follow-up study have suggested that repeated screening with faecal-occult-blood (FOB) tests can lead to a reduction in mortality from colorectal cancer (CRC). The aim of this randomised study was to compare mortality rates after FOB tests every 2 years during a 10-year period with those of unscreened similar controls.

METHODS

140,000 people aged 45-75 years lived in Funen, Denmark, in August, 1985, and were considered for inclusion in our study. Before randomisation we excluded individuals who had CRC or precursor adenomas and those who had taken part in a previous pilot study. Randomisation of 137,485 people in blocks of 14 allocated three per 14 to the screening group (30,967), three per 14 to the control group (30,966), and eight not to be enrolled in the study (75,552). Controls were not told about the study and continued to use health-care facilities as normal. Hemoccult-II blood tests (with dietary restrictions but without rehydration) were sent to screening-group participants. Only those participants who completed the first screening round were invited for further screening--five rounds of screening during a 10-year period. Participants with positive tests were asked to attend to full examination and were offered colonoscopy whenever possible. The primary endpoint was death from CRC.

FINDINGS

Of the 30,967 screening-group participants, 20,672 (67%) completed the first screening round and were invited for further screening; more than 90% accepted repeated screenings. During the 10-year study, 481 people in the screening group had a diagnosis of CRC, compared with 483 unscreened controls. There were 205 deaths attributable to CRC in the screening group, compared with 249 deaths in controls. CRC mortality, including deaths attributable to complications from CRC treatment, was significantly lower in the screening group than in controls (mortality ratio 0.82 [95% CI 0.68-0.99]) p = 0.03).

INTERPRETATION

Our findings indicate that biennial screening by FOB tests can reduce CRC mortality. This study is being continued to improve its statistical power and to assess the effect of the removal of more precursor adenomas in the screening-group participants than in controls on CRC incidence.

摘要

背景

病例对照研究以及一项基于自愿参与的随访研究表明,反复进行粪便潜血(FOB)检测可降低结直肠癌(CRC)的死亡率。这项随机研究的目的是比较在10年期间每2年进行一次FOB检测后的死亡率与未接受筛查的类似对照组的死亡率。

方法

1985年8月,丹麦菲英岛有140000名年龄在45至75岁之间的人被纳入本研究的考虑范围。在随机分组之前,我们排除了患有CRC或癌前腺瘤的个体以及那些曾参与过先前试点研究的个体。对137485人按每14人一组进行随机分组,每14人中3人被分配到筛查组(30967人),3人被分配到对照组(30966人),8人不参与本研究(75552人)。对照组未被告知本研究情况,继续正常使用医疗保健设施。向筛查组参与者发送Hemoccult-II血液检测(有饮食限制但无复水)。只有那些完成第一轮筛查的参与者才被邀请进行进一步筛查——在10年期间进行5轮筛查。检测呈阳性的参与者被要求接受全面检查,并尽可能接受结肠镜检查。主要终点是死于CRC。

结果

在30967名筛查组参与者中,20672人(67%)完成了第一轮筛查并被邀请进行进一步筛查;超过90%的人接受了反复筛查。在10年的研究期间,筛查组中有481人被诊断患有CRC,而未筛查的对照组中有483人。筛查组中有205人死于CRC,而对照组中有249人死亡。筛查组的CRC死亡率,包括因CRC治疗并发症导致的死亡,显著低于对照组(死亡率比0.82[95%CI 0.68 - 0.99])(p = 0.03)。

解读

我们的研究结果表明,通过FOB检测进行两年一次的筛查可降低CRC死亡率。本研究正在继续进行,以提高其统计效力,并评估与对照组相比,筛查组参与者切除更多癌前腺瘤对CRC发病率的影响。

相似文献

1
Randomised study of screening for colorectal cancer with faecal-occult-blood test.粪便潜血试验筛查结直肠癌的随机研究。
Lancet. 1996 Nov 30;348(9040):1467-71. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(96)03430-7.
2
Randomised controlled trial of faecal-occult-blood screening for colorectal cancer.粪便潜血筛查结直肠癌的随机对照试验。
Lancet. 1996 Nov 30;348(9040):1472-7. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(96)03386-7.
3
[Randomized population study of screening for intestinal cancer with Hemoccult-II].[使用隐血便检测Ⅱ型进行肠癌筛查的随机人群研究]
Ugeskr Laeger. 1997 Aug 11;159(33):4977-81.
4
Randomized study of biennial screening with a faecal occult blood test: results after nine screening rounds.粪便潜血试验两年一次筛查的随机研究:九轮筛查后的结果
Scand J Gastroenterol. 2004 Sep;39(9):846-51. doi: 10.1080/00365520410003182.
5
A randomised study of screening for colorectal cancer using faecal occult blood testing: results after 13 years and seven biennial screening rounds.一项使用粪便潜血试验筛查结直肠癌的随机研究:13年及七轮两年一次筛查后的结果
Gut. 2002 Jan;50(1):29-32. doi: 10.1136/gut.50.1.29.
6
Nottingham trial of faecal occult blood testing for colorectal cancer: a 20-year follow-up.英国诺丁汉大肠癌粪便潜血试验研究:20 年随访
Gut. 2012 Jul;61(7):1036-40. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2011-300774. Epub 2011 Nov 3.
7
An analysis of the duplicate testing strategy of an Irish immunochemical faecal occult blood test colorectal cancer screening programme.爱尔兰免疫化学粪便潜血试验结直肠癌筛查项目重复检测策略分析。
Colorectal Dis. 2013 Sep;15(9):e512-21. doi: 10.1111/codi.12310.
8
Implementation of colorectal cancer screening in Finland: experiences from the first three years of a public health programme.芬兰结直肠癌筛查的实施:一项公共卫生项目头三年的经验
Z Gastroenterol. 2008 Apr;46 Suppl 1:S25-8. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-963490.
9
Colorectal cancer mass screening event utilising quantitative faecal occult blood test.利用定量粪便潜血试验进行的结直肠癌群体筛查活动。
Singapore Med J. 2009 Apr;50(4):348-53.
10
[Screening for colorectal cancer in high-risk and intermediate-risk subject: what's the best tool?].[高危和中危人群的结直肠癌筛查:最佳工具是什么?]
Recenti Prog Med. 2009 Feb;100(2):68-72.

引用本文的文献

1
From small steps to big impact: what we learnt from the National Bowel Screening Programme.从小处着手,产生重大影响:我们从国家肠道筛查计划中学到了什么。
J R Soc N Z. 2025 Jul 16;55(5):1304-1321. doi: 10.1080/03036758.2025.2529350. eCollection 2025.
2
The Cost-Effectiveness of a Multi-Target Stool DNA-Based Screening (COLOTECT), FIT, Colonoscopy and No Screening for Colorectal Cancer.基于多靶点粪便DNA的结直肠癌筛查(COLOTECT)、粪便免疫化学检测(FIT)、结肠镜检查及不进行筛查的成本效益分析
Cancer Rep (Hoboken). 2025 Apr;8(4):e70176. doi: 10.1002/cnr2.70176.
3
Invitation for FOBt screening and colorectal cancer mortality: A prospective analysis in the Million Women Study cohort.
粪便潜血试验筛查与结直肠癌死亡率的关联:百万女性研究队列中的前瞻性分析。
Int J Cancer. 2025 Sep 1;157(5):867-875. doi: 10.1002/ijc.35437. Epub 2025 Apr 11.
4
Cost effectiveness analysis of three colorectal cancer screening modalities in Kuwait.科威特三种结直肠癌筛查方式的成本效益分析。
Sci Rep. 2025 Mar 1;15(1):7354. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-91119-4.
5
Colonoscopy Remains an Important Option for Primary Screening for Colorectal Cancer.结肠镜检查仍然是结直肠癌初级筛查的重要选择。
Dig Dis Sci. 2025 May;70(5):1595-1605. doi: 10.1007/s10620-024-08760-8. Epub 2024 Dec 12.
6
Possibility of determining high quantitative fecal occult blood on stool surface using hyperspectral imaging.使用高光谱成像技术在粪便表面测定高定量粪便潜血的可能性。
J Gastroenterol. 2025 Jan;60(1):77-85. doi: 10.1007/s00535-024-02163-2. Epub 2024 Oct 23.
7
Management of Patients with Colorectal Cancer through Fast-Track Surgery.结直肠癌患者的快速通道手术管理。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2024 Sep 18;21(9):1226. doi: 10.3390/ijerph21091226.
8
Impact of the serrated pathway on the simulated comparative effectiveness of colorectal cancer screening tests.锯齿状途径对结直肠癌筛查试验模拟比较效果的影响。
JNCI Cancer Spectr. 2024 Sep 2;8(5). doi: 10.1093/jncics/pkae077.
9
Differential Outcomes in Colorectal Cancer Detection: A Comparative Study of Swedish Nationwide Screening and Fast-Track Diagnostic Pathways.结直肠癌检测中的不同结果:瑞典全国筛查与快速诊断途径的比较研究
J Clin Gastroenterol. 2025 Jul 1;59(6):576-581. doi: 10.1097/MCG.0000000000002073.
10
Detection of colorectal-cancer-associated bacterial taxa in fecal samples using next-generation sequencing and 19 newly established qPCR assays.使用下一代测序技术和19种新建立的定量聚合酶链反应检测粪便样本中与结直肠癌相关的细菌类群。
Mol Oncol. 2025 Feb;19(2):412-429. doi: 10.1002/1878-0261.13700. Epub 2024 Jul 6.