• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

大环状切除术或激光锥切术后宫颈管狭窄的风险。

Risk of cervical stenosis after large loop excision or laser conization.

作者信息

Baldauf J J, Dreyfus M, Ritter J, Meyer P, Philippe E

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology 1, Hautepierre University Hospital, Strasbourg, France.

出版信息

Obstet Gynecol. 1996 Dec;88(6):933-8. doi: 10.1016/S0029-7844(96)00331-6.

DOI:10.1016/S0029-7844(96)00331-6
PMID:8942830
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To assess the frequency of cervical stenosis in patients treated by laser conization or the loop electrosurgical excision procedure and to determine the preoperative and therapeutic factors associated with its occurrence.

METHODS

Two hundred fifty-five women treated by laser conization and 277 treated by loop electrosurgical excision procedure were followed regularly by postoperative colposcopy for mean periods of 38 and 16 months, respectively. Stenosis was defined as cervical narrowing that prevented insertion of a 2.5-mm Hegar dilator.

RESULTS

Thirty-eight cases of cervical stenosis, of which seven were complete, were diagnosed up to 28 months after treatment. The risk of postoperative cervical stenosis was higher for patients over 50 years of age (relative risk [RR] 3.07, 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 1.30, 7.26; P = .031), for those with a totally endocervical lesion (RR 3.79, 95% CI 1.88, 7.62; P = .001), for those with an excision 20 mm high or greater (RR 2.96, 95% CI 1.63, 5.38; P = .005), and for those with laser conization (RR 2.35, 95% CI 1.24, 4.46; P = .009). Parity, menopause, previous treatment for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia, satisfactory colposcopy, size of the lesion, its histologic diagnosis, and the extent of excision did not increase the risk for cervical stenosis. Excision was not as high with loop electrosurgical excision as with laser conization (14.3 +/- 5.0 mm versus 20.2 +/- 6.0 mm). The height of excision (RR 1.95, 95% CI 1.02, 3.76; P = .04) and a totally endocervical lesion (RR 5.07, 95% CI 1.96, 14.44; P = .001) were the only independent factors associated with postoperative stenosis identified by a multivariate analysis using logistic regression.

CONCLUSION

The height of excision and a totally endocervical lesion were the main factors associated with cervical stenosis. The decreased risk associated with the loop electrosurgical excision procedure seems to be due to a shorter endocervical excision.

摘要

目的

评估接受激光锥切术或环形电切术治疗的患者中宫颈狭窄的发生率,并确定与其发生相关的术前及治疗因素。

方法

对255例行激光锥切术治疗的女性和277例行环形电切术治疗的女性分别进行术后阴道镜定期随访,平均随访时间分别为38个月和16个月。宫颈狭窄定义为宫颈管狭窄,无法插入2.5mm的海格扩张器。

结果

治疗后长达28个月共诊断出38例宫颈狭窄病例,其中7例为完全性狭窄。50岁以上患者术后发生宫颈狭窄的风险更高(相对危险度[RR] 3.07,95%置信区间[95%CI] 1.30,7.26;P = 0.031),宫颈管内完全病变的患者(RR 3.79,95%CI 1.88,7.62;P = 0.001),切除高度达20mm及以上的患者(RR 2.96,95%CI 1.63,5.38;P = 0.005),以及接受激光锥切术的患者(RR 2.35,95%CI 1.24,4.46;P = 0.009)。产次、绝经状态、既往宫颈上皮内瘤变治疗史、满意的阴道镜检查、病变大小、组织学诊断及切除范围均未增加宫颈狭窄风险。环形电切术的切除高度低于激光锥切术(14.3±5.0mm对20.2±6.0mm)。切除高度(RR 1.95,95%CI 1.02,3.76;P = 0.04)和宫颈管内完全病变(RR 5.07,95%CI 1.96,14.44;P = 0.001)是经逻辑回归多因素分析确定的与术后狭窄相关的仅有的独立因素。

结论

切除高度和宫颈管内完全病变是与宫颈狭窄相关的主要因素。环形电切术相关风险降低似乎是由于宫颈管内切除较短。

相似文献

1
Risk of cervical stenosis after large loop excision or laser conization.大环状切除术或激光锥切术后宫颈管狭窄的风险。
Obstet Gynecol. 1996 Dec;88(6):933-8. doi: 10.1016/S0029-7844(96)00331-6.
2
[Consequences and treatment of cervical stenoses after laser conization or loop electrosurgical excision].[激光锥切术或环形电切术切除术后宫颈狭窄的后果及治疗]
J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 1997;26(1):64-70.
3
Electrosurgical loop excision of the cervical transformation zone: the experience of family physicians.宫颈转化区的电外科环形切除术:家庭医生的经验
J Fam Pract. 1995 Oct;41(4):337-44.
4
Risk factors for cervical stenosis after laser cone biopsy.激光锥形活检术后宫颈管狭窄的危险因素。
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2002 Sep 10;104(2):144-7. doi: 10.1016/s0301-2115(02)00062-3.
5
Laser CO2 conization in postmenopausal age: risk of cervical stenosis and unsatisfactory follow-up.绝经后年龄行激光二氧化碳锥切术:宫颈管狭窄风险及随访结果不理想
Gynecol Oncol. 2005 Mar;96(3):771-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2004.11.012.
6
Loop Electrosurgical Excision Procedure Instead of Cold-Knife Conization for Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia in Women With Unsatisfactory Colposcopic Examinations: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.对于阴道镜检查结果不满意的女性,采用环形电切术而非冷刀锥切术治疗宫颈上皮内瘤变:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
J Low Genit Tract Dis. 2017 Apr;21(2):129-136. doi: 10.1097/LGT.0000000000000287.
7
Treatment for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and risk of preterm delivery.宫颈上皮内瘤变的治疗与早产风险
JAMA. 2004 May 5;291(17):2100-6. doi: 10.1001/jama.291.17.2100.
8
Recurrence rate after loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP) and laser Conization: A 5-year follow-up study.LEEP 和激光锥切术后的复发率:一项为期 5 年的随访研究。
Gynecol Oncol. 2020 Dec;159(3):636-641. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.08.025. Epub 2020 Sep 3.
9
Risk factors for cervical stenosis after loop electrocautery excision procedure.
Obstet Gynecol. 2000 Nov;96(5 Pt 1):657-60.
10
[Clinical outcome and high risk factor for residual lesion analysis of HSIL half a year after loop electrosurgical excision procedure: a clinical study of 1 502 cases].[宫颈环形电切术半年后高级别鳞状上皮内病变残留病灶分析的临床结局及高危因素:一项1502例的临床研究]
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2017 Nov 25;52(11):751-756. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0529-567X.2017.11.007.

引用本文的文献

1
Safety and effectiveness of office hysteroscopic metroplasty with and without uterine stent placement in infertile population: a 10-year retrospective study.在不孕人群中宫腔镜下子宫成形术联合或不联合放置子宫支架的安全性和有效性:一项10年回顾性研究
Ther Adv Reprod Health. 2025 Mar 21;19:26334941251324951. doi: 10.1177/26334941251324951. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.
2
Long-Term Reassurance with Negative High-Risk Human Papillomavirus (HR-HPV) and Clear Margins After Large Loop Excision of the Transformation Zone (LLETZ).转化区大环状切除术(LLETZ)后高危型人乳头瘤病毒(HR-HPV)阴性且切缘清晰的长期预后
Cancers (Basel). 2025 Feb 1;17(3):487. doi: 10.3390/cancers17030487.
3
Primary versus secondary recurrent pregnancy losses: Clinical findings and live birth rate after comprehensive work-up and personalized management.
原发性与继发性复发性流产:全面检查和个性化管理后的临床发现及活产率
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2025 Apr;104(4):697-706. doi: 10.1111/aogs.15050. Epub 2025 Jan 21.
4
Short term complications of conisation and long term effects on fertility related outcomes in Denmark: register based nationwide cohort study.丹麦锥切术的短期并发症及对生育相关结局的长期影响:基于全国登记的队列研究
BMJ. 2025 Jan 15;388:e078140. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2023-078140.
5
Cervical Stenosis After Hysteroscopic Surgery for Cesarean Scar Disorder.剖宫产瘢痕疾病宫腔镜手术后的宫颈狭窄
Cureus. 2024 Mar 25;16(3):e56922. doi: 10.7759/cureus.56922. eCollection 2024 Mar.
6
Atypical lobular endocervical glandular hyperplasia: two case report and literature review.非典型小叶状宫颈内膜腺性增生:两例报告及文献综述
Front Oncol. 2023 Dec 5;13:1298793. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1298793. eCollection 2023.
7
Uterine cervical stenosis: from classification to advances in management. Overcoming the obstacles to access the uterine cavity.子宫颈狭窄:从分类到管理进展。克服进入子宫腔的障碍。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2024 Mar;309(3):755-764. doi: 10.1007/s00404-023-07126-1. Epub 2023 Jul 10.
8
Diagnostic Utility of Hysteroscopic Biopsy in Cases of Suspected Lobular Endocervical Glandular Hyperplasia and Comparison with Cervical Conization.宫腔镜活检在疑似宫颈小叶状腺性增生病例中的诊断效用及与宫颈锥切术的比较
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Jun 1;11(11):1619. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11111619.
9
Role of an IUCD in managing patients with post-LLETZ cervical stenosis.宫内节育器(IUCD)在治疗 LLETZ 术后宫颈狭窄患者中的作用。
BMJ Case Rep. 2022 Mar 1;15(3):e246118. doi: 10.1136/bcr-2021-246118.
10
Mechanical dilatation of the stenosed cervix under local anesthesia: A prospective case series.局部麻醉下狭窄宫颈的机械扩张:一项前瞻性病例系列研究。
J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2022 Apr;48(4):956-965. doi: 10.1111/jog.15179. Epub 2022 Feb 7.