Ankel-Simons F, Cummins J M
Duke University Primate Center, Durham, NC 27705, USA.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996 Nov 26;93(24):13859-63. doi: 10.1073/pnas.93.24.13859.
In vertebrates, inheritance of mitochondria is thought to be predominantly maternal, and mitochondrial DNA analysis has become a standard taxonomic tool. In accordance with the prevailing view of strict maternal inheritance, many sources assert that during fertilization, the sperm tail, with its mitochondria, gets excluded from the embryo. This is incorrect. In the majority of mammals-including humans-the midpiece mitochondria can be identified in the embryo even though their ultimate fate is unknown. The "missing mitochondria" story seems to have survived--and proliferated-unchallenged in a time of contention between hypotheses of human origins, because it supports the "African Eve" model of recent radiation of Homo sapiens out of Africa. We will discuss the infiltration of this mistake into concepts of mitochondrial inheritance and human evolution.
在脊椎动物中,线粒体的遗传被认为主要是母系遗传,线粒体DNA分析已成为一种标准的分类工具。按照严格母系遗传的主流观点,许多资料称在受精过程中,精子尾部及其线粒体被排除在胚胎之外。这是不正确的。在大多数哺乳动物(包括人类)中,即使中部线粒体的最终命运未知,也能在胚胎中识别出它们。在人类起源假说的争论时期,“缺失线粒体”的说法似乎未经质疑就留存了下来并不断扩散,因为它支持了现代人类从非洲向外辐射的“非洲夏娃”模型。我们将讨论这一错误是如何渗透到线粒体遗传和人类进化概念中的。