Purdy L M
Wells College, Aurora, New York, USA.
J Med Philos. 1996 Oct;21(5):499-514. doi: 10.1093/jmp/21.5.499.
This article critically evaluates the central claims of the various feminist responses to new reproductive arrangements and technologies. Proponents of a "progressivism" object to naive technological optimism and raise questions about the control of such technology. Others, such as the FINRRAGE group, raise concerns about the potentially damaging consequences of the new technologies for women. While a central concern is whether these technologies reinforce harmful biologically determinist stereotypes of women, it may be that these critiques function with a devastating gender blindness that puts women at risk in other, heretofore unnoticed, ways.
本文批判性地评估了各种女权主义对新的生殖安排和技术的回应中的核心主张。“进步主义”的支持者反对天真的技术乐观主义,并对这类技术的控制提出质疑。其他一些人,比如国际生殖权利行动联盟(FINRRAGE)组织,则对新技术可能给女性带来的破坏性后果表示担忧。虽然一个核心问题是这些技术是否强化了对女性有害的生物决定论刻板印象,但这些批评可能在一种毁灭性的性别盲视中起作用,从而以其他迄今未被注意到的方式将女性置于危险之中。