Brind J, Chinchilli V M, Severs W B, Summy-Long J
Department of Natural Sciences, Baruch College, City University of New York, NY 10010, USA.
J Epidemiol Community Health. 1996 Oct;50(5):481-96. doi: 10.1136/jech.50.5.481.
To ascertain, from the published reports to date, whether or not a significantly increased risk of breast cancer is specifically attributable to a history of induced abortion, independent of spontaneous abortion and age at first full term pregnancy (or first live birth); to establish the relative magnitude of such risk increase as may be found, and to ascertain and quantify such risk increases as may pertain to particular subpopulations of women exposed to induced abortion; in particular, nulliparous women and parous women exposed before compared with after the first full term pregnancy.
The meta-analysis includes all 28 published reports which include specific data on induced abortion and breast cancer incidence. Since some study data are presented in more than one report, the 28 reports were determined to constitute 23 independent studies. Overall induced abortion odds ratios and odds ratios for the different subpopulations were calculated using an average weighted according to the inverse of the variance. An overall unweighted average was also computed for comparison. No quality criteria were imposed, but a narrative review of all included studies is presented for the reader's use in assessing the quality of individual studies. EXCLUDED STUDIES: All 33 published reports including data on abortion and breast cancer incidence but either pertaining only to spontaneous abortion or to abortion without specification as to whether it was induced or spontaneous. These studies are listed for the reader's information.
The overall odds ratio (for any induced abortion exposure; n = 21 studies) was 1.3 (95% confidence interval of 1.2, 1.4). For comparison, the unweighted overall odds ratio was 1.4 (1.3,1.6). The odds ratio for nulliparous women was 1.3 (1.0,1.6), that for abortion before the first term pregnancy in parous women was 1.5 (1.2,1.8), and that for abortion after the first term pregnancy was 1.3 (1.1,1.5).
The results support the inclusion of induced abortion among significant independent risk factors for breast cancer, regardless of parity or timing of abortion relative to the first term pregnancy. Although the increase in risk was relatively low, the high incidence of both breast cancer and induced abortion suggest a substantial impact of thousands of excess cases per year currently, and a potentially much greater impact in the next century, as the first cohort of women exposed to legal induced abortion continues to age.
根据迄今已发表的报告,确定人工流产史是否会独立于自然流产和首次足月妊娠(或首次活产)年龄,导致乳腺癌风险显著增加;确定可能发现的此类风险增加的相对幅度,并确定和量化与接受人工流产的特定女性亚群相关的此类风险增加;特别是未生育女性以及首次足月妊娠前后接受人工流产的已生育女性。
该荟萃分析纳入了所有28篇已发表的报告,这些报告包含人工流产和乳腺癌发病率的具体数据。由于一些研究数据在不止一篇报告中呈现,这28篇报告被确定构成23项独立研究。使用根据方差倒数加权平均法计算总体人工流产比值比以及不同亚群的比值比。还计算了总体未加权平均值以供比较。未施加质量标准,但对所有纳入研究进行了叙述性综述,供读者用于评估个别研究的质量。
所有33篇已发表的报告,这些报告包含流产和乳腺癌发病率数据,但仅涉及自然流产或未明确说明是人工流产还是自然流产的流产情况。列出这些研究供读者参考。
总体比值比(针对任何人工流产暴露;n = 21项研究)为1.3(95%置信区间为1.2,1.4)。作为比较,未加权总体比值比为1.4(1.3,1.6)。未生育女性的比值比为1.3(1.0,1.6),已生育女性首次足月妊娠前人工流产的比值比为1.5(1.2,1.8),首次足月妊娠后人工流产的比值比为1.3(1.1,1.5)。
结果支持将人工流产纳入乳腺癌重要独立风险因素之中,无论流产时的生育状况或相对于首次足月妊娠的时间如何。尽管风险增加相对较低,但乳腺癌和人工流产的高发病率表明,目前每年有数千例额外病例受到重大影响,并且随着首批接受合法人工流产的女性持续老龄化,在下个世纪可能产生更大的影响。