Leverette J, Massabki A, Peterson H
Department of Psychiatry, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario.
Can J Psychiatry. 1996 Nov;41(9):578-81. doi: 10.1177/070674379604100906.
The introduction of a national process to match Canadian medical students to postgraduate year-one (PGY-1) positions in psychiatry created for the first time a cohort of subjects whose choices of a particular training program could be evaluated and compared with American peers. The primary goal of this study was to determine the factors affecting the students' selection of the specific postgraduate programs in which they would train and to compare the findings with those in the American literature.
A self-administered questionnaire was sent to 110 trainees who began training in July 1994 identified in the 16 Canadian university departments of psychiatry.
Canadian trainees, like their American counterparts, relied heavily on nonprogrammatic factors in program choice, but differed in emphasizing vocational prospects after residency.
When competing for enrollment within a reduced pool of applicants, program directors need to recognize how programs are evaluated, what factors are controllable, and how best to market the individual assets of their programs.
引入一项全国性程序,将加拿大医学生与精神病学研究生一年级(PGY - 1)职位进行匹配,这首次创建了一个研究对象群体,其对特定培训项目的选择能够得到评估,并与美国同龄人进行比较。本研究的主要目标是确定影响学生选择其将接受培训的特定研究生项目的因素,并将研究结果与美国文献中的结果进行比较。
向1994年7月开始培训的110名学员发放了一份自填式问卷,这些学员来自加拿大16所大学的精神病学系。
与美国学员一样,加拿大受训人员在项目选择上严重依赖非项目因素,但在强调住院医师培训后的职业前景方面存在差异。
在申请人数量减少的情况下竞争招生时,项目主任需要认识到项目是如何被评估的、哪些因素是可控的,以及如何最好地推销其项目的个人优势。