• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

健康中心的学前发育筛查——未就诊问题

Pre-school development screening in a health centre--the problem of non-attendance.

作者信息

Freer C B, Ogunmuyiwa T A

出版信息

J R Coll Gen Pract. 1977 Jul;27(180):428-30.

PMID:894643
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2158116/
Abstract

Poor attendance at a health centre pre-school child screening clinic (total default rate 41.2 per cent) raises the question of whether selective screening would be a more realistic alternative to comprehensive screening. Furthermore, an analysis of the outcome of screening over one year has shown a low prevalence of abnormalities and underlines the need to justify such programmes as worthwhile screening tests.The most efficient method of detecting child-hood abnormalities at an early a stage as possible remains an open question, but with present financial restrictions and staff shortages, whatever programmes are used, rigorous continuing evaluation is essential.

摘要

某健康中心学龄前儿童筛查诊所的就诊率很低(总违约率为41.2%),这就引发了一个问题:选择性筛查是否会是全面筛查更现实的替代方案。此外,对一年筛查结果的分析显示异常情况的发生率较低,并强调有必要证明此类项目作为有价值的筛查测试是合理的。尽早发现儿童期异常情况的最有效方法仍是一个悬而未决的问题,但鉴于目前的资金限制和人员短缺,无论采用何种项目,严格的持续评估都是必不可少的。

相似文献

1
Pre-school development screening in a health centre--the problem of non-attendance.健康中心的学前发育筛查——未就诊问题
J R Coll Gen Pract. 1977 Jul;27(180):428-30.
2
Attendance at a child health clinic in Malaysia.在马来西亚一家儿童健康诊所的就诊情况。
J Trop Med Hyg. 1975 Jan;78(1):6-12.
3
Patterns of attendance at developmental assessment clinics.发育评估诊所的就诊模式。
J R Coll Gen Pract. 1983 Apr;33(249):213-8.
4
Evaluation of growth monitoring programme in children in Kinshasa.金沙萨儿童生长监测项目评估
East Afr Med J. 1997 Feb;74(2):96-9.
5
Pain among children and adolescents: restrictions in daily living and triggering factors.儿童和青少年的疼痛:日常生活中的限制及触发因素。
Pediatrics. 2005 Feb;115(2):e152-62. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-0682.
6
An investigation into the default rate at the Fife colposcopy clinic: implications for target setting.对法夫阴道镜诊所违约率的调查:对目标设定的影响。
J Public Health Med. 1995 Mar;17(1):65-9.
7
A review of school vision screening in Glasgow.格拉斯哥学校视力筛查综述。
Health Bull (Edinb). 1997 Mar;55(2):118-25.
8
Woodside Health Centre. An experiment in the developmental screening of pre-school children.伍德赛德健康中心。一项针对学龄前儿童发育筛查的实验。
Health Bull (Edinb). 1973 May;31(3):156-60.
9
Parents' preferences for services for children with hearing loss: a conjoint analysis study.父母对听力损失儿童服务的偏好:一项联合分析研究。
Ear Hear. 2007 Dec;28(6):842-9. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e318157676d.
10
A new visual chart for pre-school developmental screening.一种用于学前发育筛查的新视觉图表。
Health Bull (Edinb). 1976 Mar;34(2):80-91.

引用本文的文献

1
Use of the child health clinic.儿童健康诊所的使用情况。
Arch Dis Child. 1981 Jun;56(6):440-5. doi: 10.1136/adc.56.6.440.
2
Paediatric surveillance: performance review and the primary care team.儿科监测:绩效评估与基层医疗团队
J R Coll Gen Pract. 1984 Mar;34(260):152-4.
3
Developmental screening for pre-school children: is it worthwhile?学龄前儿童的发育筛查:是否值得?
J R Coll Gen Pract. 1989 Apr;39(321):133-5.
4
Trainee projects.实习生项目。
J R Coll Gen Pract. 1979 Aug;29(205):452-5.

本文引用的文献

1
Infants at risk of handicapping conditions.有身心障碍风险的婴儿。
Mon Bull Minist Health Public Health Lab Serv. 1962 Dec;21:238-45.
2
Risk registers for babies.婴儿风险登记册。
Dev Med Child Neurol. 1967 Feb;9(1):13-21. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8749.1967.tb02204.x.
3
An evaluation of developmental examination as a method of detecting neurological, visual, and auditory handicaps in infancy.对发育检查作为检测婴儿期神经、视觉和听觉障碍方法的评估。
Br J Prev Soc Med. 1972 May;26(2):94-100. doi: 10.1136/jech.26.2.94.
4
The results of developmental screening in general practice.全科医疗中的发育筛查结果。
Health Bull (Edinb). 1974 Sep;32(5):189-93.
5
The "at risk" register: a statistical evaluation.“风险”登记册:一项统计评估。
Br J Prev Soc Med. 1970 Aug;24(3):129-35. doi: 10.1136/jech.24.3.129.
6
The "at risk" infant.“高危”婴儿。
Lancet. 1967 Sep 30;2(7518):711-3. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(67)90989-0.
7
Infancy and childhood.婴儿期和儿童期。
Lancet. 1974 Nov 2;2(7888):1057-61. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(74)92162-x.
8
Screening for disease: Definitions and criteria.
Lancet. 1974 Oct 5;2(7884):819-22. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(74)91082-4.
9
Child health clincs and inverse care laws: evidence from longitudinal study of 1878 pre-school children.儿童健康诊所与逆向医疗法则:来自1878名学龄前儿童纵向研究的证据
Br Med J. 1976 Aug 14;2(6032):411-3. doi: 10.1136/bmj.2.6032.411.
10
A new visual chart for pre-school developmental screening.一种用于学前发育筛查的新视觉图表。
Health Bull (Edinb). 1976 Mar;34(2):80-91.