Newby K H, Zimerman L, Wharton J M, Kent V, Kearney M, Brandon M J, Natale A
VA Medical Center Electrophysiology Laboratory, Durham, NC 27705, USA.
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1996 Nov;19(11 Pt 1):1612-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1996.tb03188.x.
The presence of chronic indwelling leads in the area targeted for RF ablation may pose a technical challenge and reduce the chance of success of the ablation. In addition, application of lesions in close proximity to pacemaker leads or other permanent catheters could affect their function. Fourteen patients referred for RF ablation of atrial flutter/fibrillation and atrial tachycardia, who had a permanent dual chamber pacemaker (10 patients), ICD (1 patient), or both (3 patients) were studied to assess the safety, efficacy, and effects of the ablative procedure on device function. Lead impedance, R and P wave amplitude, and pacing threshold of the defibrillator and pacemaker were measured before and after ablation. The procedure was successful in all patients. In one patient who underwent both atrial flutter and atrial fibrillation ablation, the atrial pacing threshold increased from 1.0 preablation to 2.0 V postablation. No P wave was detectable after ablation. In another patient, the P wave amplitude went from 4.0 to 2.0 mV postablation. In both patients the device converted to the power reset mode. No changes were observed in the remaining patients. Postablation defibrillator testing showed no malfunction. Follow-up reinterrogation of the devices revealed no alterations.
(1) RF ablation of atrial flutter and/or tachycardia is feasible even in patients with multiple chronic atrial and ventricular indwelling catheters; and (2) RF applications in close proximity of defibrillator and pacing catheters does not appear to alter their function unless lesions are produced in the area surrounding the distal pacing electrode.
在射频消融的目标区域存在慢性留置导线可能带来技术挑战并降低消融成功的几率。此外,在起搏器导线或其他永久性导管附近施加消融灶可能会影响其功能。对14例因心房扑动/颤动和房性心动过速接受射频消融治疗的患者进行了研究,这些患者中有10例植入了永久性双腔起搏器,1例植入了植入式心律转复除颤器(ICD),3例同时植入了两者,以评估消融手术的安全性、有效性以及对设备功能的影响。在消融前后测量了导线阻抗、R波和P波振幅以及除颤器和起搏器的起搏阈值。所有患者的手术均成功。在1例同时接受心房扑动和心房颤动消融的患者中,心房起搏阈值从消融前的1.0V增加到消融后的2.0V。消融后未检测到P波。在另1例患者中,消融后P波振幅从4.0mV降至2.0mV。这2例患者的设备均转换为功率重置模式。其余患者未观察到变化。消融后除颤器测试未显示故障。对设备的随访再次询问未发现改变。
(1)即使在有多个慢性心房和心室留置导管的患者中进行心房扑动和/或心动过速的射频消融也是可行的;(2)在除颤器和起搏导管附近进行射频应用似乎不会改变其功能,除非在远端起搏电极周围区域产生消融灶。