Inama G, Gramegna L, Pessano P, Vergara G, Disertori M
Divisione di Cardiologia, Ospedale S. Chiara, Trento.
G Ital Cardiol. 1998 Jun;28(6):666-77.
Type I atrial flutter (AF) is a supraventricular tachycardia that is notoriously disabling and resistant to antiarrhythmic drugs. The introduction of an effective non-pharmacologic technique, such as radiofrequency catheter ablation (RF), opened new therapeutic prospects for the management of this arrhythmia. The aim of our study was to evaluate the long-term efficacy of atrial flutter RF using a successful procedure marker of bi-directional conduction block in the isthmus.
In the last consecutive 50 patients (pts) who underwent RF procedure for AF at our Center (46 pts during spontaneous or induced AF and 4 in sinus rhythm) after the successful interruption of AF we performed the usual reinduction attempts and well atrial pacing from 2 sites in the right atrium (in 18 pts before and after RF and in 32 only after RF). The sites of pacing were site 1: low lateral right atrium (LRA); site 2: proximal coronary sinus (PCS). The 50 pts consisted of 13 females, 37 males with a mean age of 62.5 +/- 9.7 years (35-83). The end-point for the procedure was: 1) abrupt interruption of AF; 2) inability to reinduce AF; 3) recognition of atrial activation sequence during pacing in LRA and in PCS compatible with conduction block in the isthmus.
The RF was successful in terminating AF in all pts after 11 +/- 7 applications of energy. After ablation, sustained AF was no longer inducible by atrial pacing. After RF, during pacing in sinus rhythm from LRA, the lower septum and PCS presented a delayed activation after the His region. Similarly, during pacing from PCS after ablation, the atrial activation sequence was modified: the low lateral right atrium was now activated by a single front after the high lateral atrium. No acute complications were noted in any pts during or after procedure. AF recurred in 9 pts. Four pts now present chronic atrial fibrillation. The mean follow-up period is 14.8 +/- 8 months. All the patients were discharged without antiarrhythmic therapy.
The mechanism of successful ablation is the bi-directional conduction block in the isthmus with the evidence of the changes in the right atrial activation sequence during atrial pacing in sinus rhythm in LRA and in PCS before and after RF.
I型心房扑动(AF)是一种室上性心动过速,其致残性强且对抗心律失常药物耐药。有效非药物技术如射频导管消融(RF)的引入为这种心律失常的治疗开辟了新的前景。我们研究的目的是使用峡部双向传导阻滞这一成功手术标志来评估心房扑动RF的长期疗效。
在我们中心连续50例接受AF射频手术的患者(46例在自发或诱发AF期间,4例在窦性心律时)中,AF成功终止后,我们进行了常规的再次诱发尝试以及从右心房两个部位进行心房起搏(18例在RF前后,32例仅在RF后)。起搏部位为:部位1:右心房低侧壁(LRA);部位2:冠状窦近端(PCS)。50例患者包括13名女性,37名男性,平均年龄62.5±9.7岁(35 - 83岁)。手术终点为:1)AF突然终止;2)无法再次诱发AF;3)在LRA和PCS起搏期间识别出与峡部传导阻滞相符的心房激动顺序。
在平均11±7次能量应用后,RF成功终止了所有患者的AF。消融后,心房起搏不再能诱发持续性AF。RF后,在窦性心律下从LRA起搏时,下间隔和PCS在希氏区之后出现延迟激动。同样,消融后从PCS起搏时,心房激动顺序发生改变:现在右心房低侧壁在高侧壁之后由单一波前激动。手术期间及术后任何患者均未出现急性并发症。9例患者AF复发。4例患者现患有慢性心房颤动。平均随访期为14.8±8个月。所有患者均未接受抗心律失常治疗出院。
成功消融的机制是峡部双向传导阻滞,有RF前后窦性心律下LRA和PCS心房起搏期间右心房激动顺序改变的证据。