Epstein M
Nephrology Section, Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Miami, Florida 33125, USA.
Ren Fail. 1996 Nov;18(6):813-32. doi: 10.3109/08860229609047709.
During the past two decades, major investigative interest has been focused on the determinants of chronic renal disease and interventions to retard the inexorable progression to end-stage renal disease. Recent studies have provided a theoretic framework for anticipating that angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, and possibly calcium antagonists, may preferentially retard the progression of renal disease. Whereas the majority of available clinical trials have assessed the effects of ACE inhibitors in patients with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM), there are relatively few long-term studies that have evaluated the renal protective effects of ACE inhibitors and calcium antagonists in patients with nondiabetic renal disease. Although clinical trials have been initiated using both of these drug classes as monotherapy, theoretical considerations suggest that fixed-dose combinations of an ACE inhibitor and a calcium antagonist might be appealing as renal protective agents. Several lines of evidence suggest that the renal microcirculatory effects of coadministration of both agents should be complementary. Similarly, recent observations suggest that the two classes may act in a complementary manner to countervail pathogenetic mechanisms at the level of the mesangium. A recent study in type II diabetic patients demonstrated that combination therapy with an ACE inhibitor and a calcium antagonist induced the greatest reduction in proteinuria, and reduced the rate of decline in glomerular filtration rate (GFR) more than did either agent alone at the same level of blood pressure reduction. Based on such considerations, recent randomized prospective studies have been initiated to compare the renal protective effects of combination calcium antagonist-ACE inhibitor therapy versus monotherapy with agents of either of these two antihypertensive classes.
在过去二十年中,主要的研究兴趣集中在慢性肾病的决定因素以及延缓其不可避免地进展至终末期肾病的干预措施上。最近的研究提供了一个理论框架,预计血管紧张素转换酶(ACE)抑制剂以及可能的钙拮抗剂可能会优先延缓肾病的进展。虽然大多数现有的临床试验评估了ACE抑制剂对胰岛素依赖型糖尿病(IDDM)患者的影响,但相对较少有长期研究评估ACE抑制剂和钙拮抗剂对非糖尿病肾病患者的肾脏保护作用。尽管已经开始使用这两类药物进行单一疗法的临床试验,但理论上认为,ACE抑制剂和钙拮抗剂的固定剂量组合作为肾脏保护剂可能很有吸引力。几条证据表明,同时使用这两种药物对肾脏微循环的影响应该是互补的。同样,最近的观察结果表明,这两类药物可能以互补的方式作用,以抵消系膜水平的致病机制。最近一项针对II型糖尿病患者的研究表明,与单独使用任何一种药物相比,ACE抑制剂和钙拮抗剂联合治疗在相同血压降低水平下,蛋白尿减少最多,肾小球滤过率(GFR)下降速度减缓。基于这些考虑,最近已经启动了随机前瞻性研究,以比较钙拮抗剂-ACE抑制剂联合治疗与这两种抗高血压药物单一疗法的肾脏保护作用。