• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂和钙拮抗剂在延缓进行性肾衰竭中的益处:聚焦于固定剂量复方抗高血压治疗。

The benefits of ACE inhibitors and calcium antagonists in slowing progressive renal failure: focus on fixed-dose combination antihypertensive therapy.

作者信息

Epstein M

机构信息

Nephrology Section, Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Miami, Florida 33125, USA.

出版信息

Ren Fail. 1996 Nov;18(6):813-32. doi: 10.3109/08860229609047709.

DOI:10.3109/08860229609047709
PMID:8948517
Abstract

During the past two decades, major investigative interest has been focused on the determinants of chronic renal disease and interventions to retard the inexorable progression to end-stage renal disease. Recent studies have provided a theoretic framework for anticipating that angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, and possibly calcium antagonists, may preferentially retard the progression of renal disease. Whereas the majority of available clinical trials have assessed the effects of ACE inhibitors in patients with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM), there are relatively few long-term studies that have evaluated the renal protective effects of ACE inhibitors and calcium antagonists in patients with nondiabetic renal disease. Although clinical trials have been initiated using both of these drug classes as monotherapy, theoretical considerations suggest that fixed-dose combinations of an ACE inhibitor and a calcium antagonist might be appealing as renal protective agents. Several lines of evidence suggest that the renal microcirculatory effects of coadministration of both agents should be complementary. Similarly, recent observations suggest that the two classes may act in a complementary manner to countervail pathogenetic mechanisms at the level of the mesangium. A recent study in type II diabetic patients demonstrated that combination therapy with an ACE inhibitor and a calcium antagonist induced the greatest reduction in proteinuria, and reduced the rate of decline in glomerular filtration rate (GFR) more than did either agent alone at the same level of blood pressure reduction. Based on such considerations, recent randomized prospective studies have been initiated to compare the renal protective effects of combination calcium antagonist-ACE inhibitor therapy versus monotherapy with agents of either of these two antihypertensive classes.

摘要

在过去二十年中,主要的研究兴趣集中在慢性肾病的决定因素以及延缓其不可避免地进展至终末期肾病的干预措施上。最近的研究提供了一个理论框架,预计血管紧张素转换酶(ACE)抑制剂以及可能的钙拮抗剂可能会优先延缓肾病的进展。虽然大多数现有的临床试验评估了ACE抑制剂对胰岛素依赖型糖尿病(IDDM)患者的影响,但相对较少有长期研究评估ACE抑制剂和钙拮抗剂对非糖尿病肾病患者的肾脏保护作用。尽管已经开始使用这两类药物进行单一疗法的临床试验,但理论上认为,ACE抑制剂和钙拮抗剂的固定剂量组合作为肾脏保护剂可能很有吸引力。几条证据表明,同时使用这两种药物对肾脏微循环的影响应该是互补的。同样,最近的观察结果表明,这两类药物可能以互补的方式作用,以抵消系膜水平的致病机制。最近一项针对II型糖尿病患者的研究表明,与单独使用任何一种药物相比,ACE抑制剂和钙拮抗剂联合治疗在相同血压降低水平下,蛋白尿减少最多,肾小球滤过率(GFR)下降速度减缓。基于这些考虑,最近已经启动了随机前瞻性研究,以比较钙拮抗剂-ACE抑制剂联合治疗与这两种抗高血压药物单一疗法的肾脏保护作用。

相似文献

1
The benefits of ACE inhibitors and calcium antagonists in slowing progressive renal failure: focus on fixed-dose combination antihypertensive therapy.血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂和钙拮抗剂在延缓进行性肾衰竭中的益处:聚焦于固定剂量复方抗高血压治疗。
Ren Fail. 1996 Nov;18(6):813-32. doi: 10.3109/08860229609047709.
2
Calcium antagonists and renal protection: emerging perspectives.钙拮抗剂与肾脏保护:新观点
J Hypertens Suppl. 1998 Sep;16(4):S17-25.
3
[The effect of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors on the progression of chronic renal failure].[血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂对慢性肾衰竭进展的影响]
Presse Med. 2002 Nov 9;31(36):1714-20.
4
Renal protection and antihypertensive drugs: current status.肾脏保护与抗高血压药物:现状
Drugs. 1999 May;57(5):665-93. doi: 10.2165/00003495-199957050-00002.
5
Renal protection in hypertensive patients: selection of antihypertensive therapy.高血压患者的肾脏保护:抗高血压治疗的选择
Drugs. 2005;65 Suppl 2:29-39. doi: 10.2165/00003495-200565002-00005.
6
The case for combining angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and calcium-channel blockers.联合使用血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂和钙通道阻滞剂的理由。
Curr Hypertens Rep. 1999 Oct;1(5):446-53. doi: 10.1007/s11906-999-0062-1.
7
Renoprotective effects of antihypertensive drugs.抗高血压药物的肾脏保护作用。
Am J Hypertens. 1999 Jan;12(1 Pt 2):19S-32S. doi: 10.1016/s0895-7061(98)00210-6.
8
Calcium channel blockers in the prevention of end stage renal disease: a review.钙通道阻滞剂在预防终末期肾病中的应用:综述
Acta Clin Belg. 2004 Jan-Feb;59(1):44-56. doi: 10.1179/acb.2004.007.
9
Angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors, calcium channel blockers, and their combination in the treatment of glomerular disease.血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂、钙通道阻滞剂及其联合应用于肾小球疾病的治疗
J Hypertens Suppl. 1997 Mar;15(2):S21-6.
10
Calcium antagonists and the progression of chronic renal failure.钙拮抗剂与慢性肾衰竭的进展
Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens. 1998 Mar;7(2):171-6. doi: 10.1097/00041552-199803000-00005.

引用本文的文献

1
Rationale for the use of a fixed-dose combination in the management of hypertension: efficacy and tolerability of lercanidipine/enalapril.固定剂量复方制剂在高血压治疗中的应用依据:乐卡地平/依那普利的疗效和耐受性。
Clin Drug Investig. 2010;30(12):843-54. doi: 10.1007/BF03256912.
2
Fixed combination trandolapril/verapamil sustained-release: a review of its use in essential hypertension.固定复方制剂群多普利/维拉帕米缓释片:用于原发性高血压的综述
Drugs. 2002;62(17):2539-67. doi: 10.2165/00003495-200262170-00014.
3
Rationale for fixed-dose combinations in the treatment of hypertension: the cycle repeats.
固定剂量复方制剂治疗高血压的理论依据:循环往复。
Drugs. 2002;62(3):443-62. doi: 10.2165/00003495-200262030-00003.
4
The case for combining angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and calcium-channel blockers.联合使用血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂和钙通道阻滞剂的理由。
Curr Hypertens Rep. 1999 Oct;1(5):446-53. doi: 10.1007/s11906-999-0062-1.
5
Renal protection and antihypertensive drugs: current status.肾脏保护与抗高血压药物:现状
Drugs. 1999 May;57(5):665-93. doi: 10.2165/00003495-199957050-00002.
6
Fixed-dose combination therapy: panacea or poison?固定剂量复方疗法:万灵药还是毒药?
Intensive Care Med. 1998 Apr;24(4):283-5. doi: 10.1007/s001340050569.