Whelton P K, Harrington D P, Russell R P, White R I, Walker W G
Johns Hopkins Med J. 1977 Sep;141(3):112-8.
Seventy patients undergoing renal arteriography were studied prospectively to define optimal techniques of renal venous sampling and to establish the most appropriate methods for interpretation of renal vein renin and activity (RVRA). Plasma renin activity values from the aorta, the antecubital vein and the lower inferior vena cava were nearly identical. The relationship between renal vein renin activity in the two renal veins was not influenced by lack of simultaneous sampling or by contrast administration. Thirty-one patients with normal arteriograms had a mean RVRA ratio (right over left) of 1.12 +/- .11 (mean +/- SEM) but RVRA difference (right minus left) of only 0.02 +/- .11 ng/ml/hr. In contrast 16 patients with "significant" (greater than 70%) narrowing of the main renal artery had a mean RVRA ratio (involved over uninvolved) of 4.3 +/- 1.2 and a mean RVRA difference (involved minus uninvolved) of 3.9 +/- 1.4 ng/ml/hr. Seven patients (22%) with normal arteriograms had "abnormal" RVRA ratios (greater than or equal 1.5) but corresponding RVRA differences within one standard deviation of the group mean. Thus the difference inRVRA between both renal veins may more accurately reflect a patient's renovascular status than does the corresponding RVRA ratio. An "abnormal" RVRA ratio alone inadequately indicates the presence of renal ischemia.
对70例接受肾动脉造影的患者进行了前瞻性研究,以确定肾静脉采样的最佳技术,并建立解释肾静脉肾素及活性(RVRA)的最合适方法。来自主动脉、肘前静脉和下腔静脉的血浆肾素活性值几乎相同。两条肾静脉中肾静脉肾素活性之间的关系不受非同步采样或造影剂注射的影响。31例动脉造影正常的患者,其平均RVRA比值(右侧/左侧)为1.12±0.11(平均值±标准误),但RVRA差值(右侧-左侧)仅为0.02±0.11 ng/ml/小时。相比之下,16例主要肾动脉“显著”(大于70%)狭窄的患者,其平均RVRA比值(受累侧/未受累侧)为4.3±1.2,平均RVRA差值(受累侧-未受累侧)为3.9±1.4 ng/ml/小时。7例(22%)动脉造影正常的患者RVRA比值“异常”(大于或等于1.5),但其相应的RVRA差值在该组平均值的一个标准差范围内。因此,两条肾静脉之间的RVRA差值可能比相应的RVRA比值更准确地反映患者的肾血管状态。单独的“异常”RVRA比值不足以表明存在肾缺血。