• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

冠状动脉搭桥手术后的不良脑部转归。围手术期缺血研究组和缺血研究与教育基金会调查员的多中心研究。

Adverse cerebral outcomes after coronary bypass surgery. Multicenter Study of Perioperative Ischemia Research Group and the Ischemia Research and Education Foundation Investigators.

作者信息

Roach G W, Kanchuger M, Mangano C M, Newman M, Nussmeier N, Wolman R, Aggarwal A, Marschall K, Graham S H, Ley C

机构信息

Kaiser Permanente Medical Center, San Francisco, CA, USA.

出版信息

N Engl J Med. 1996 Dec 19;335(25):1857-63. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199612193352501.

DOI:10.1056/NEJM199612193352501
PMID:8948560
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Acute changes in cerebral function after elective coronary bypass surgery is a difficult clinical problem. We carried out a multicenter study to determine the incidence and predictors of -- and the use of resources associated with -- perioperative adverse neurologic events, including cerebral injury.

METHODS

In a prospective study, we evaluated 2108 patients from 24 U.S. institutions for two general categories of neurologic outcome: type I (focal injury, or stupor or coma at discharge) and type II (deterioration in intellectual function, memory deficit, or seizures).

RESULTS

Adverse cerebral outcomes occurred in 129 patients (6.1 percent). A total of 3.1 percent had type I neurologic outcomes (8 died of cerebral injury, 55 had nonfatal strokes, 2 had transient ischemic attacks, and 1 had stupor), and 3.0 percent had type II outcomes (55 had deterioration of intellectual function and 8 had seizures). Patients with adverse cerebral outcomes had higher in-hospital mortality (21 percent of patients with type I outcomes died, vs. 10 percent of those with type II and 2 percent of those with no adverse cerebral outcome; P<0.001 for all comparisons), longer hospitalization (25 days with type I outcomes, 21 days with type II, and 10 days with no adverse outcome; P<0.001), and a higher rate of discharge to facilities for intermediate- or long-term care (69 percent, 39 percent, and 10 percent ; P<0.001). Predictors of type I outcomes were proximal aortic atherosclerosis, a history of neurologic disease, and older age; predictors of type II outcomes were older age, systolic hypertension on admission, pulmonary disease, and excessive consumption of alcohol.

CONCLUSIONS

Adverse cerebral outcomes after coronary bypass surgery are relatively common and serious; they are associated with substantial increases in mortality, length of hospitalization, and use of intermediate- or long-term care facilities. New diagnostic and therapeutic strategies must be developed to lessen such injury.

摘要

背景

择期冠状动脉搭桥手术后脑功能的急性变化是一个棘手的临床问题。我们开展了一项多中心研究,以确定围手术期不良神经事件(包括脑损伤)的发生率、预测因素以及与之相关的资源使用情况。

方法

在一项前瞻性研究中,我们评估了来自美国24家机构的2108例患者的两种一般类型的神经学结局:I型(局灶性损伤,或出院时昏迷或昏睡)和II型(智力功能减退、记忆缺陷或癫痫发作)。

结果

129例患者(6.1%)出现不良脑结局。共有3.1%的患者出现I型神经学结局(8例死于脑损伤,55例发生非致命性卒中,2例发生短暂性脑缺血发作,1例昏睡),3.0%的患者出现II型结局(55例智力功能减退,8例癫痫发作)。出现不良脑结局的患者院内死亡率更高(I型结局患者中有21%死亡,II型患者为10%,无不良脑结局患者为2%;所有比较P<0.001),住院时间更长(I型结局患者为25天,II型为21天,无不良结局患者为10天;P<0.001),转至中长期护理机构的出院率更高(分别为69%、39%和10%;P<0.001)。I型结局的预测因素为升主动脉粥样硬化、神经疾病史和高龄;II型结局的预测因素为高龄、入院时收缩期高血压、肺部疾病和过量饮酒。

结论

冠状动脉搭桥手术后的不良脑结局相对常见且严重;它们与死亡率、住院时间以及中长期护理机构的使用大幅增加相关。必须制定新的诊断和治疗策略以减轻此类损伤。

相似文献

1
Adverse cerebral outcomes after coronary bypass surgery. Multicenter Study of Perioperative Ischemia Research Group and the Ischemia Research and Education Foundation Investigators.冠状动脉搭桥手术后的不良脑部转归。围手术期缺血研究组和缺血研究与教育基金会调查员的多中心研究。
N Engl J Med. 1996 Dec 19;335(25):1857-63. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199612193352501.
2
Pulse pressure and risk of adverse outcome in coronary bypass surgery.冠状动脉搭桥手术中的脉压与不良结局风险
Anesth Analg. 2008 Oct;107(4):1122-9. doi: 10.1213/ane.0b013e31816ba404.
3
Aspirin and mortality from coronary bypass surgery.阿司匹林与冠状动脉搭桥手术死亡率
N Engl J Med. 2002 Oct 24;347(17):1309-17. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa020798.
4
Incidence and predictors of tias and strokes following coronary artery bypass grafting: report and collective review.冠状动脉搭桥术后短暂性脑缺血发作和中风的发生率及预测因素:报告与综合综述
Heart Surg Forum. 1999;2(3):242-5.
5
Preoperative statin therapy is associated with reduced cardiac mortality after coronary artery bypass graft surgery.冠状动脉搭桥手术后,术前他汀类药物治疗与降低心脏死亡率相关。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2006 Aug;132(2):392-400. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2006.04.009.
6
Impact of preoperative anemia on outcome in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery.术前贫血对冠状动脉搭桥手术患者预后的影响。
Circulation. 2007 Jul 31;116(5):471-9. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.653501. Epub 2007 Jul 9.
7
Association of perioperative myocardial ischemia with cardiac morbidity and mortality in men undergoing noncardiac surgery. The Study of Perioperative Ischemia Research Group.非心脏手术男性患者围手术期心肌缺血与心脏发病率和死亡率的关联。围手术期缺血研究组。
N Engl J Med. 1990 Dec 27;323(26):1781-8. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199012273232601.
8
Predictors of type II neurologic complications after coronary artery bypass graft surgery.
Int Surg. 2008 May-Jun;93(3):133-8.
9
Women have worse long-term outcomes after coronary artery bypass grafting than men.冠状动脉搭桥术后,女性的长期预后比男性更差。
Can J Cardiol. 2005 Jul;21(9):757-62.
10
Multicenter preoperative stroke risk index for patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Multicenter Study of Perioperative Ischemia (McSPI) Research Group.冠状动脉搭桥手术患者的多中心术前卒中风险指数。围手术期缺血多中心研究(McSPI)研究小组。
Circulation. 1996 Nov 1;94(9 Suppl):II74-80.

引用本文的文献

1
Postoperative stroke in CABG: a ten-year study of stroke incidence and contributing risk factors in Jordan.冠状动脉旁路移植术术后中风:约旦中风发病率及相关危险因素的十年研究
J Med Life. 2025 Jul;18(7):621-625. doi: 10.25122/jml-2024-0326.
2
Hemodynamic control during cardiopulmonary bypass and the incidence of postoperative delirium- a post hoc analysis.体外循环期间的血流动力学控制与术后谵妄的发生率——一项事后分析
BMC Anesthesiol. 2025 May 26;25(1):267. doi: 10.1186/s12871-025-03141-8.
3
Perioperative management of adult patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting and valve surgery: a literature review.
接受冠状动脉搭桥术和瓣膜手术的成年患者的围手术期管理:文献综述
Einstein (Sao Paulo). 2025 May 2;23:eRW1353. doi: 10.31744/einstein_journal/2025RW1353. eCollection 2025.
4
Neuroprotective Strategies in Coronary Artery Disease Interventions.冠状动脉疾病干预中的神经保护策略
J Cardiovasc Dev Dis. 2025 Apr 8;12(4):143. doi: 10.3390/jcdd12040143.
5
Minimizing stroke risk in off-pump CABG: the role of clampless devices and the piggyback proximal anastomosis technique.非体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植术中降低中风风险:无钳夹装置及“背驮式”近端吻合技术的作用
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2025 Mar 3;12:1555394. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2025.1555394. eCollection 2025.
6
Comparison of percutaneous coronary intervention vs coronary artery bypass graft for left main coronary artery disease in patients with prior cerebrovascular disease: A systematic review, meta-analysis and meta-regression.既往有脑血管疾病患者左主干冠状动脉疾病行冠状动脉介入治疗与冠状动脉旁路移植术的比较:一项系统评价、荟萃分析和荟萃回归分析
Int J Cardiol Cardiovasc Risk Prev. 2025 Jan 9;24:200370. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcrp.2025.200370. eCollection 2025 Mar.
7
Clinical and subclinical acute brain injury caused by invasive cardiovascular procedures.侵入性心血管操作引起的临床和亚临床急性脑损伤。
Nat Rev Cardiol. 2025 Apr;22(4):273-303. doi: 10.1038/s41569-024-01076-0. Epub 2024 Oct 11.
8
Anti-inflammatory effect of colchicine on organ damage during the perioperative period of cardiac surgery: a study protocol for a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial.秋水仙碱对心脏手术围手术期器官损伤的抗炎作用:一项多中心、随机、双盲、安慰剂对照临床试验的研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2024 Sep 12;14(9):e084368. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-084368.
9
Cognitive Training for Reduction of Delirium in Patients Undergoing Cardiac Surgery: A Randomized Clinical Trial.心脏手术患者认知训练以减少谵妄:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Apr 1;7(4):e247361. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.7361.
10
Clinical outcomes of on-pump versus off-pump coronary-artery bypass surgery: a meta-analysis.在体循环与非体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植术的临床结局比较:一项荟萃分析。
Int J Surg. 2024 Aug 1;110(8):5063-5070. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000001481.