• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经6F引导导管进行冠状动脉血管成形术

[Coronary angioplasty through 6 French guiding catheters].

作者信息

Morís de la Tassa C, Rodríguez Lambert J L, Santos A E, Villa R B, Rodríguez Blanco V M, Barriales Alvarez V, Llosa A C

机构信息

Laboratorio de Hemodinámica, Hospital Central de Asturias, Universidad de Oviedo.

出版信息

Rev Esp Cardiol. 1996 Feb;49(2):124-9.

PMID:8948722
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The development of new small guiding catheters with large internal lumen has allowed their use in routine coronary angioplasty.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study is to present the technical characteristics, results and complication rates obtained with the use of 6 French guiding catheters compared with those obtained with the use of 8 French.

METHODS

During a 23 month period, a total of 355 consecutive patients was enrolled in this study. Coronary angioplasty was performed in 177 of them using a 6F guiding catheter and 178 using an 8F.

RESULTS

We found no differences in technical characteristics between both groups: Radiation time (15.7 +/- 14 min vs 16.2 +/- 14 min), guiding catheter to patient ratio (1.1 +/- 0.3 vs 1.06 +/- 0.2), number of balloon catheters per patient (1.2 +/- 0.7 vs 1.36 +/- 0.7). There were no differences in the results obtained (Success 93% in 6F group vs 91% in 8F), major complication rates (Death 0.5% vs 1.6%, CABG 1.1% vs 2.2% or AMI 0% vs 2.2%), or peripheral complications.

CONCLUSIONS

In coronary angioplasty, with the use of 6F guiding catheters the same results can be achieved as with the use of larger catheters without an increase in technical difficulties or in complication rates.

摘要

背景

新型大内腔小引导导管的研发使其可用于常规冠状动脉血管成形术。

目的

本研究旨在呈现使用6F引导导管与8F引导导管相比所获得的技术特征、结果及并发症发生率。

方法

在23个月期间,本研究共纳入355例连续患者。其中177例使用6F引导导管进行冠状动脉血管成形术,178例使用8F引导导管。

结果

我们发现两组在技术特征方面无差异:放射时间(15.7±14分钟对16.2±14分钟)、引导导管与患者比例(1.1±0.3对1.06±0.2)、每位患者使用的球囊导管数量(1.2±0.7对1.36±0.7)。所获得的结果(6F组成功率为93%,8F组为91%)、主要并发症发生率(死亡率0.5%对1.6%,冠状动脉旁路移植术1.1%对2.2%,或急性心肌梗死0%对2.2%)或外周并发症方面均无差异。

结论

在冠状动脉血管成形术中,使用6F引导导管可获得与使用较大导管相同的结果,且不会增加技术难度或并发症发生率。

相似文献

1
[Coronary angioplasty through 6 French guiding catheters].经6F引导导管进行冠状动脉血管成形术
Rev Esp Cardiol. 1996 Feb;49(2):124-9.
2
Safety and acceptable initial outcomes of reused balloon catheters for percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty.经皮腔内冠状动脉成形术重复使用球囊导管的安全性及可接受的初始结果
J Med Assoc Thai. 2000 Dec;83(12):1471-7.
3
A randomized trial of 5 versus 7 French guiding catheters for transfemoral percutaneous coronary stent implantation.一项关于5F与7F引导导管用于经股动脉经皮冠状动脉支架植入术的随机试验。
J Interv Cardiol. 2008 Feb;21(1):50-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8183.2007.00315.x. Epub 2007 Dec 17.
4
[Coronary transluminal angioplasty using 6-french diagnostic catheters. A preliminary study].
Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss. 1994 Apr;87(4):491-7.
5
[Evaluation of the systematic use of wide lumen 6 French guiding catheters in conventional coronary angioplasty].
Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss. 1995 Sep;88(9):1291-9.
6
Miniaturization of the equipment for percutaneous coronary interventions: a prospective study in 1,200 patients.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗设备的小型化:一项针对1200例患者的前瞻性研究。
J Invasive Cardiol. 2003 Jan;15(1):6-11.
7
Percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty through six French catheters.
J Invasive Cardiol. 1992 Sep;4(7):335-8.
8
Comparison of 5 French versus 6 French guiding catheters for transradial coronary intervention: a prospective, randomized study.经桡动脉冠状动脉介入治疗中5F与6F引导导管的比较:一项前瞻性随机研究。
J Invasive Cardiol. 2004 Jul;16(7):353-5.
9
Percutaneous coronary interventions using a new 5 French guiding catheter: results of a prospective study.使用新型5法国引导导管的经皮冠状动脉介入治疗:一项前瞻性研究的结果
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2001 Jul;53(3):308-12. doi: 10.1002/ccd.1172.
10
Five French versus 6 French PCI: a case control study of efficacy, safety and outcome.5F与6F经皮冠状动脉介入治疗:一项关于疗效、安全性和结局的病例对照研究
J Invasive Cardiol. 2002 Nov;14(11):670-4.

引用本文的文献

1
Operator-Controlled Comparison Between 5 French and 6 French Guiding Catheters for Percutaneous Intervention Using Transradial Approach.经桡动脉途径经皮介入治疗中5F与6F引导导管的术者控制比较
Cureus. 2020 Jun 2;12(6):e8406. doi: 10.7759/cureus.8406.