Suppr超能文献

[MAG 3和二乙三胺五乙酸肾动态显像在肾动脉狭窄诊断中的诊断价值]

[Diagnostic value of renal scintigraphy with MAG 3 and DTPA in the diagnosis of renal artery stenosis].

作者信息

Tremel F, Caravel J P, Siché J P, Chevallier M, Mallion J M

机构信息

Service de médecine interne et cardiologie, CHU, Grenoble.

出版信息

Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss. 1996 Aug;89(8):1035-9.

PMID:8949374
Abstract

UNLABELLED

Angiography still remains the first line investigation to demonstrate a renal artery stenosis. We have evaluated the sensitivity and the specificity of renal scintigraphy in the diagnosis of renal artery stenosis using two technetium markers, MAG 3 and DTPA.

PATIENTS

45 hypertensive (HT) patients (WHO criteria) referred for investigation of renovascular hypertension according to the criteria of the AHA Scientific Council and were found to have a unilateral renal artery stenosis of varying severity. Age was 61 > +/- 13 years; sex-ratio F/M 21/24; creatinine < 150 mumol/l. There were non insulin dependent diabetics, and none had been treated with ACE inhibitors or diuretics for 15 days. Bilateral arterial stenosis was excluded a posteriori.

METHODS

MAG3 and DTPA scintigraphy were performed one hour after a dose of 25 mg of captopril plus hydration with 500 ml of intravenous saline. Blood pressure was measured by dynamap every 15 min from minus one hour to the end of the study. The principle outcome measure was nephorgram phase and the secondary measure was the angiographic phase (two images per second). The two scintigraphy techniques were performed at a mean interval of 2.9 +/- 2.1 days. Digitized angiography via the arterial route was performed using left anterior oblique and right anterior oblique images.

RESULTS

[table: see text]

CONCLUSION

There was only one false positive scintigraphy result with a polar artery. In contrast 45% of unilateral stenoses were not diagnosed by scintigraphy. Both markers gave similar results even if subjectively the MAG3 images were of better quality. Analysis of the angiographic phase and of the size of the kidneys did not improve the diagnostic accuracy and could lead to false positive results.

摘要

未标注

血管造影术仍然是显示肾动脉狭窄的一线检查方法。我们使用两种锝标记物MAG 3和二乙三胺五乙酸(DTPA)评估了肾闪烁显像在肾动脉狭窄诊断中的敏感性和特异性。

患者

45例高血压(HT)患者(符合世界卫生组织标准),根据美国心脏协会科学委员会的标准被转诊以调查肾血管性高血压,结果发现存在不同严重程度的单侧肾动脉狭窄。年龄为61±13岁;男女比例为21/24;肌酐<150微摩尔/升。有非胰岛素依赖型糖尿病患者,且在15天内均未接受过血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂或利尿剂治疗。双侧动脉狭窄事后被排除。

方法

在服用25毫克卡托普利并静脉输注500毫升生理盐水进行水化后1小时,进行MAG3和DTPA闪烁显像。从研究前1小时至研究结束,每15分钟用电子血压计测量血压。主要观察指标是肾图阶段,次要观察指标是血管造影阶段(每秒两张图像)。两种闪烁显像技术的平均间隔时间为2.9±2.1天。通过动脉途径进行数字化血管造影,使用左前斜位和右前斜位图像。

结果

[见表文]

结论

极动脉的闪烁显像结果仅有1例假阳性。相比之下,45%的单侧狭窄未被闪烁显像诊断出来。即使主观上MAG3图像质量更好,两种标记物给出的结果相似。对血管造影阶段和肾脏大小的分析并未提高诊断准确性,还可能导致假阳性结果。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验