Duff S E, Dixon A R
Department of General Surgery, Frenchay Hospital, Bristol, UK.
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2000 Nov;82(6):388-91.
Debate exists about the benefits of laparoscopic appendicectomy when compared to a conventional open procedure. The majority of appendices are removed by the open route in the UK. We report a series of 132 cases of suspected appendicitis managed laparoscopically: 112 (85%) of the patients had acute appendicitis, the remaining 20 (15%) had non-appendiceal pathology. The median operative time was 30 min and there were no conversions to an open operative procedure. The median postoperative stay was two days. Complications were seen in two patients. The published evidence comparing laparoscopic and open appendicectomy is contradictory. Our series shows that laparoscopic appendicectomy is a safe procedure with low morbidity; it is also an excellent training tool in laparoscopic technique and, with sufficient experience, takes no longer than an open procedure. Negative appendicocecotomies are most common in women of fertile age and can be associated with significant morbidity; therefore, laparoscopy should be used to make the diagnosis and, if appendicitis is the cause, the appendix could safely be removed laparoscopically. However, the choice between open and laparoscopic procedure is a subjective decision for the patient and their surgeon. Laparoscopic appendicectomy cannot be regarded as the gold standard.
与传统的开放手术相比,腹腔镜阑尾切除术的益处存在争议。在英国,大多数阑尾切除是通过开放手术进行的。我们报告了一系列132例疑似阑尾炎患者接受腹腔镜手术治疗的病例:其中112例(85%)患者患有急性阑尾炎,其余20例(15%)患有非阑尾病变。中位手术时间为30分钟,无转为开放手术的情况。中位术后住院时间为两天。两名患者出现了并发症。已发表的比较腹腔镜阑尾切除术和开放阑尾切除术的证据相互矛盾。我们的系列研究表明,腹腔镜阑尾切除术是一种安全、发病率低的手术;它也是腹腔镜技术的优秀培训工具,且有足够经验的话,手术时间并不比开放手术长。阴性阑尾切除术在育龄女性中最为常见,可能会导致明显的发病率;因此,应使用腹腔镜进行诊断,如果是阑尾炎所致,可通过腹腔镜安全地切除阑尾。然而,开放手术和腹腔镜手术之间的选择对于患者及其外科医生来说是一个主观决定。腹腔镜阑尾切除术不能被视为金标准。