• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Laparoscopic appendicectomy: safe and useful for training.腹腔镜阑尾切除术:对培训而言安全且实用。
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2000 Nov;82(6):388-91.
2
Prevention of intra-abdominal abscess following laparoscopic appendicectomy for perforated appendicitis: a prospective study.腹腔镜阑尾切除术治疗穿孔性阑尾炎后腹腔内脓肿的预防:一项前瞻性研究
Int J Surg. 2008 Oct;6(5):374-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2008.06.006. Epub 2008 Jun 27.
3
Is early laparoscopic appendectomy feasible in children with acute appendicitis presenting with an appendiceal mass? A prospective study.对于伴有阑尾包块的急性阑尾炎患儿,早期腹腔镜阑尾切除术是否可行?一项前瞻性研究。
J Pediatr Surg. 2005 Jul;40(7):1134-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2005.03.046.
4
Laparoscopic appendicectomy: review of 331 cases over 7 years, in a Saudi Arabian hospital.腹腔镜阑尾切除术:沙特一家医院7年331例病例回顾
Endoscopy. 2002 Aug;34(8):639-42. doi: 10.1055/s-2002-33241.
5
[Laparoscopy and suspected acute appendicitis].[腹腔镜检查与疑似急性阑尾炎]
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 2005 Jun 30;125(13):1820-1.
6
[Acute appendicitis--open or laparoscopic surgery?].[急性阑尾炎——开腹手术还是腹腔镜手术?]
Przegl Lek. 2003;60 Suppl 7:70-4.
7
Laparoscopic appendicectomy for complicated appendicitis: is it safe and justified?: A retrospective analysis.腹腔镜阑尾切除术治疗复杂性阑尾炎:是否安全且合理?一项回顾性分析。
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2011 Jun;21(3):142-5. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0b013e31821ad770.
8
Prospective randomized multicentre study of laparoscopic versus open appendicectomy.腹腔镜与开腹阑尾切除术的前瞻性随机多中心研究
Br J Surg. 1999 Jan;86(1):48-53. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2168.1999.00971.x.
9
[Laparoscopic or open appendectomy. Critical review of the literature and personal experience].[腹腔镜或开放性阑尾切除术。文献综述与个人经验]
G Chir. 2001 Oct;22(10):353-7.
10
[Laparoscopic approach in acute appendicitis: experience with 501 consecutive cases].[急性阑尾炎的腹腔镜手术方法:501例连续病例的经验]
Chir Ital. 2009 May-Jun;61(3):327-35.

引用本文的文献

1
Resident Learning Curve for Laparoscopic Appendectomy According to Seniority.根据资历划分的腹腔镜阑尾切除术住院医师学习曲线
Ann Coloproctol. 2020 Jul;36(3):163-171. doi: 10.3393/ac.2019.07.20. Epub 2020 Feb 14.
2
Outcome comparison between laparoscopic and open appendectomy: evidence from a nationwide population-based study.腹腔镜与开腹阑尾切除术的疗效比较:一项基于全国人群的研究证据。
PLoS One. 2013 Jul 12;8(7):e68662. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0068662. Print 2013.
3
Province-wide population survey of acute appendicitis in Canada. New twists to an old disease.加拿大全省范围内的急性阑尾炎人口调查。一种古老疾病的新情况。
Surg Endosc. 2007 Aug;21(8):1383-7. doi: 10.1007/s00464-007-9227-7. Epub 2007 Feb 16.
4
Training in laparoscopic appendectomy.腹腔镜阑尾切除术培训。
World J Surg. 2006 Mar;30(3):358-63. doi: 10.1007/s00268-005-0311-7.
5
Laparoscopic surgery for common surgical emergencies: a population-based study.常见外科急症的腹腔镜手术:一项基于人群的研究。
Surg Endosc. 2005 Jun;19(6):774-9. doi: 10.1007/s00464-004-9158-5. Epub 2005 May 4.

本文引用的文献

1
A case for the removal of the 'normal' appendix at laparoscopy for suspected acute appendicitis.关于在腹腔镜检查时因疑似急性阑尾炎而切除“正常”阑尾的病例报告。
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1999 Jul;81(4):279-80.
2
Prospective randomized multicentre study of laparoscopic versus open appendicectomy.腹腔镜与开腹阑尾切除术的前瞻性随机多中心研究
Br J Surg. 1999 Jan;86(1):48-53. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2168.1999.00971.x.
3
Laparoscopic appendectomy does not change the incidence of postoperative infectious complications.腹腔镜阑尾切除术不会改变术后感染性并发症的发生率。
Am J Surg. 1998 Mar;175(3):232-5. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9610(97)00286-9.
4
Appendicitis: laparoscopic versus conventional operation: a study and review of the literature.阑尾炎:腹腔镜手术与传统手术对比:一项研究及文献综述
Surg Laparosc Endosc. 1997 Dec;7(6):459-63.
5
Laparoscopic appendectomy-is it worthwhile? A prospective, randomized study in young women.腹腔镜阑尾切除术——值得做吗?一项针对年轻女性的前瞻性随机研究。
Surg Endosc. 1997 Feb;11(2):95-7. doi: 10.1007/s004649900305.
6
Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: prospective randomized trial.腹腔镜与开腹阑尾切除术:前瞻性随机试验
World J Surg. 1996 Jan;20(1):17-20; discussion 21. doi: 10.1007/s002689900003.
7
Laparoscopic appendectomy.腹腔镜阑尾切除术
World J Surg. 1993 Jan-Feb;17(1):29-33. doi: 10.1007/BF01655701.
8
Laparoscopic versus conventional appendectomy.腹腔镜阑尾切除术与传统阑尾切除术
Ann Surg. 1993 Nov;218(5):685-92. doi: 10.1097/00000658-199321850-00016.
9
A prospective randomized trial comparing open versus laparoscopic appendectomy.一项比较开放式与腹腔镜阑尾切除术的前瞻性随机试验。
Ann Surg. 1994 Jun;219(6):725-8; discussion 728-31. doi: 10.1097/00000658-199406000-00017.
10
Laparoscopic versus open appendicectomy: prospective randomised trial.腹腔镜与开腹阑尾切除术:前瞻性随机试验。
Lancet. 1993 Sep 11;342(8872):633-7. doi: 10.1016/0140-6736(93)91757-d.

腹腔镜阑尾切除术:对培训而言安全且实用。

Laparoscopic appendicectomy: safe and useful for training.

作者信息

Duff S E, Dixon A R

机构信息

Department of General Surgery, Frenchay Hospital, Bristol, UK.

出版信息

Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2000 Nov;82(6):388-91.

PMID:11103154
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2503470/
Abstract

Debate exists about the benefits of laparoscopic appendicectomy when compared to a conventional open procedure. The majority of appendices are removed by the open route in the UK. We report a series of 132 cases of suspected appendicitis managed laparoscopically: 112 (85%) of the patients had acute appendicitis, the remaining 20 (15%) had non-appendiceal pathology. The median operative time was 30 min and there were no conversions to an open operative procedure. The median postoperative stay was two days. Complications were seen in two patients. The published evidence comparing laparoscopic and open appendicectomy is contradictory. Our series shows that laparoscopic appendicectomy is a safe procedure with low morbidity; it is also an excellent training tool in laparoscopic technique and, with sufficient experience, takes no longer than an open procedure. Negative appendicocecotomies are most common in women of fertile age and can be associated with significant morbidity; therefore, laparoscopy should be used to make the diagnosis and, if appendicitis is the cause, the appendix could safely be removed laparoscopically. However, the choice between open and laparoscopic procedure is a subjective decision for the patient and their surgeon. Laparoscopic appendicectomy cannot be regarded as the gold standard.

摘要

与传统的开放手术相比,腹腔镜阑尾切除术的益处存在争议。在英国,大多数阑尾切除是通过开放手术进行的。我们报告了一系列132例疑似阑尾炎患者接受腹腔镜手术治疗的病例:其中112例(85%)患者患有急性阑尾炎,其余20例(15%)患有非阑尾病变。中位手术时间为30分钟,无转为开放手术的情况。中位术后住院时间为两天。两名患者出现了并发症。已发表的比较腹腔镜阑尾切除术和开放阑尾切除术的证据相互矛盾。我们的系列研究表明,腹腔镜阑尾切除术是一种安全、发病率低的手术;它也是腹腔镜技术的优秀培训工具,且有足够经验的话,手术时间并不比开放手术长。阴性阑尾切除术在育龄女性中最为常见,可能会导致明显的发病率;因此,应使用腹腔镜进行诊断,如果是阑尾炎所致,可通过腹腔镜安全地切除阑尾。然而,开放手术和腹腔镜手术之间的选择对于患者及其外科医生来说是一个主观决定。腹腔镜阑尾切除术不能被视为金标准。