• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

噪音和嗓音强度增加对口吃的影响。

Effects of noise and increased vocal intensity on stuttering.

作者信息

Garber S F, Martin R R

出版信息

J Speech Hear Res. 1977 Jun;20(2):233-40. doi: 10.1044/jshr.2002.233.

DOI:10.1044/jshr.2002.233
PMID:895095
Abstract

The present study was designed to assess the effects of increased vocal level on stuttering in the presence and absence of noise, and to assess the effects of noise on stuttering with and without a concomitant increase in vocal level. Accordingly, eight adult stutterers spoke in quiet with normal vocal level, in quiet with increased vocal level, in noise with normal level, and in noise with increased level. All subjects reduced stuttering in noise compared with quiet conditions. However, there was no difference in stuttering when subjects spoke with normal compared with increased vocal level. In the present study, reductions in stuttering under noise could not be explained by increases in vocal level. It appears, instead, that reductions in stuttering were related to a decrease in auditory feedback. The condition which resulted in the largest decrease in auditory feedback, speaking in noise with a normal level, also resulted in the largest decrease in stuttering.

摘要

本研究旨在评估在有噪声和无噪声情况下,提高发声水平对口吃的影响,以及评估在有和没有伴随发声水平提高的情况下,噪声对口吃的影响。因此,八名成年口吃者分别在安静环境中以正常发声水平说话、在安静环境中以提高的发声水平说话、在有噪声环境中以正常水平说话,以及在有噪声环境中以提高的水平说话。与安静环境相比,所有受试者在有噪声环境中的口吃情况都有所减少。然而,当受试者以正常发声水平与提高的发声水平说话时,口吃情况没有差异。在本研究中,噪声环境下口吃的减少不能用发声水平的提高来解释。相反,口吃的减少似乎与听觉反馈的减少有关。导致听觉反馈减少最多的情况,即在有噪声环境中以正常水平说话,也导致了口吃减少最多。

相似文献

1
Effects of noise and increased vocal intensity on stuttering.噪音和嗓音强度增加对口吃的影响。
J Speech Hear Res. 1977 Jun;20(2):233-40. doi: 10.1044/jshr.2002.233.
2
Auditory stimulation, rhythm, and stuttering.听觉刺激、节奏与口吃。
J Speech Hear Res. 1985 Dec;28(4):487-95. doi: 10.1044/jshr.2804.487.
3
Sidetone amplification, noise, and stuttering.
J Speech Hear Res. 1984 Dec;27(4):518-27. doi: 10.1044/jshr.2704.518.
4
Changes in voice level caused by several forms of altered feedback in fluent speakers and stutterers.流利说话者和口吃者在几种形式的改变反馈下声音水平的变化。
Lang Speech. 1990 Oct-Dec;33 ( Pt 4):325-38. doi: 10.1177/002383099003300402.
5
Effects of noise and rhythmic stimulation on the speech of stutterers.噪音和节律性刺激对口吃者言语的影响。
J Speech Hear Res. 1978 Jun;21(2). doi: 10.1044/jshr.2102.285.
6
The effects of auditory masking on the anxiety level, frequency of dysfluency, and selected vocal characteristics of stutterers.听觉掩蔽对口吃者焦虑水平、言语不流畅频率及特定嗓音特征的影响。
J Speech Hear Res. 1972 Sep;15(3):572-8. doi: 10.1044/jshr.1503.572.
7
Voicing duration and vocal SPL changes associated with stuttering reduction during singing.与唱歌时口吃减少相关的发声时长和嗓音声压级变化。
J Speech Hear Res. 1979 Sep;22(3):468-79. doi: 10.1044/jshr.2203.468.
8
Some effects of noise on the speaking behavior of stutterers.噪音对口吃者言语行为的一些影响。
J Speech Hear Res. 1974 Dec;17(4):714-23. doi: 10.1044/jshr.1704.714.
9
The influence of selected masking noises on Lombard and sidetone amplification effects.所选掩蔽噪声对隆巴德效应和侧音放大效应的影响。
J Speech Hear Res. 1976 Sep;19(3):523-35. doi: 10.1044/jshr.1903.523.
10
Effects of five experimental treatments of stuttering.口吃的五种实验性治疗方法的效果
J Speech Hear Res. 1979 Mar;22(1):132-46. doi: 10.1044/jshr.2201.132.

引用本文的文献

1
Overreliance on auditory feedback may lead to sound/syllable repetitions: simulations of stuttering and fluency-inducing conditions with a neural model of speech production.过度依赖听觉反馈可能导致声音/音节重复:使用言语产生的神经模型模拟口吃和流畅诱导条件。
J Fluency Disord. 2010 Sep;35(3):246-79. doi: 10.1016/j.jfludis.2010.05.002. Epub 2010 May 20.
2
Reduction of stuttering by young male stutterers using EMG feedback.年轻男性口吃者使用肌电图反馈减少口吃现象。
Biofeedback Self Regul. 1982 Sep;7(3):241-55. doi: 10.1007/BF00998918.