Suppr超能文献

广告、计算机与制药责任。密歇根州一家法院的判决对药学服务产生了影响。

Advertising, computers, and pharmacy liability. A Michigan court's decision has ramifications for pharmaceutical care.

作者信息

Cacciatore G G

机构信息

Department of Clinical Sciences and Administration, University of Houston College of Pharmacy, Tex, USA.

出版信息

J Am Pharm Assoc (Wash). 1996 Nov;NS36(11):651-4.

PMID:8952252
Abstract

Arbor Drugs, Inc., advertised that its computer could detect dangerous drug interactions. A pharmacist failed to warn a patient accordingly and the patient suffered a stroke as a result of an interaction between tranylcypromine and a decongestant. The Michigan Court of Appeals held that this failure to warn was actionable under the theories of negligence and fraud as well as under the Michigan Consumer Protection Act. The court's basic message is that pharmacies may be held legally responsible for preventing harm when they represent themselves as being capable of doing so.

摘要

阿伯制药公司宣称其计算机能够检测出危险的药物相互作用。一名药剂师未据此警告一名患者,该患者因反苯环丙胺和解充血药之间的相互作用而中风。密歇根上诉法院认为,这种未作警告的行为根据过失、欺诈理论以及《密歇根消费者保护法》是可诉的。法院的基本观点是,当药店宣称自己有能力预防伤害时,它们可能会被追究法律责任。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验