Suppr超能文献

根据Friedewald公式测定LDL胆固醇在持续性非卧床腹膜透析(CAPD)和血液透析(HD)患者中准确吗?

Is the determination of LDL cholesterol according to Friedewald accurate in CAPD and HD patients?

作者信息

Nauck M, Krämer-Guth A, Bartens W, März W, Wieland H, Wanner C

机构信息

Department of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Germany.

出版信息

Clin Nephrol. 1996 Nov;46(5):319-25.

PMID:8953121
Abstract

Lipid abnormalities are a major cause of accelerated atherosclerosis in patients with end-stage renal disease. In many clinical laboratories, the concentration of low density lipoproteins (LDL), the most atherogenic lipoprotein fraction, is estimated by calculating LDL cholesterol according to Friedewald. Hypertriglyceridemia, a common finding in uremic patients, is a main limitation to the use of the Friedewald formula, and the estimation of LDL cholesterol may, therefore, not be reliable in these patients. As accurate quantitation of LDL cholesterol is needed to decide on the initiation of lipid lowering therapy, we have evaluated the accuracy of the Friedewald formula in 171 patients on continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD), 136 hemodialysis (HD) patients and 887 clinically healthy individuals by comparing it with a combined ultracentrifugation and precipitation 'reference' method. When we excluded sera with total triglycerides above 400 mg/dl [4.56 mmol/l], the Friedewald formula correlated excellently with the reference method; non-parametric correlation coefficients were 0.976, 0.971, and 0.956 in clinically healthy individuals, CAPD and HD patients, respectively. In the control individuals, the Friedewald formula produced slightly lower concentrations of LDL cholesterol than the reference method (means: 142 +/- 40 mg/dl vs 150 +/- 39 mg/dl or 3.68 + 1.04 mmol/l vs. to 3.89 + 1.01 mmol/l, respectively). This was also true in HD patients (means: 145 +/- 51 vs. 146 +/- 49 mg/dl or 3.76 +/- 1.32 vs. 3.78 +/- 1.27 mmol/l, respectively), but not in CAPD patients (means: 165 +/- 50 vs. 162 +/- 47 mg/dl or 4.27 +/- 1.30 vs. 4.20 +/- 1.22 mmol/l). Our data show that, unlike in other forms of secondary dyslipoproteinemia, the Friedewald formula is sufficiently reliable in patients with end-stage renal disease. Much the same, however, as in control individuals, other methods to quantify LDL cholesterol like ultracentrifugation or lipoprotein electrophoresis are recommended when serum triglycerides exceed 400 mg/dl [4.56 mmol/l].

摘要

脂质异常是终末期肾病患者动脉粥样硬化加速的主要原因。在许多临床实验室中,通过Friedewald公式计算低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(LDL)的浓度来估算最具致动脉粥样硬化性的脂蛋白组分——低密度脂蛋白的浓度。高甘油三酯血症是尿毒症患者的常见表现,是使用Friedewald公式的主要限制因素,因此,在这些患者中估算LDL胆固醇可能不可靠。由于启动降脂治疗需要准确测定LDL胆固醇,我们通过将Friedewald公式与超速离心和沉淀相结合的“参考”方法进行比较,评估了171例持续非卧床腹膜透析(CAPD)患者、136例血液透析(HD)患者和887例临床健康个体中Friedewald公式的准确性。当我们排除总甘油三酯高于400mg/dl [4.56mmol/l]的血清时,Friedewald公式与参考方法的相关性非常好;临床健康个体、CAPD患者和HD患者的非参数相关系数分别为0.976、0.971和0.956。在对照组个体中,Friedewald公式得出的LDL胆固醇浓度略低于参考方法(均值:分别为142±40mg/dl对150±39mg/dl或3.68±1.04mmol/l对3.89±1.01mmol/l)。HD患者中也是如此(均值:分别为145±51对146±49mg/dl或3.76±1.32对3.78±1.27mmol/l),但CAPD患者并非如此(均值:分别为165±50对162±47mg/dl或4.27±1.30对4.20±1.22mmol/l)。我们的数据表明,与其他形式的继发性血脂异常不同,Friedewald公式在终末期肾病患者中足够可靠。然而,与对照组个体情况大致相同的是,当血清甘油三酯超过400mg/dl [4.56mmol/l]时,建议采用其他量化LDL胆固醇的方法,如超速离心或脂蛋白电泳。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验