Suppr超能文献

血液透析患者血清中镁和钙的离子化水平与总水平的测量。

Measurement of serum ionized versus total levels of magnesium and calcium in hemodialysis patients.

作者信息

Saha H, Harmoinen A, Pietilä K, Mörsky P, Pasternack A

机构信息

University of Tampere, Medical School, Finland.

出版信息

Clin Nephrol. 1996 Nov;46(5):326-31.

PMID:8953122
Abstract

Until recently, only techniques for measuring total magnesium have been available. Now commercially available instruments using new ion-selective electrodes (ISE) for Mg+2 have made possible reliable measurement of ionized magnesium also in clinical practice. We measured changes induced by a hemodialysis session in serum ionized and total pools of magnesium and calcium using ISE methods. When compared with levels in age- and sex-matched control subjects, both serum ionized magnesium (0.68 +/- 0.11 vs. 0.56 +/- 0.06 mmol/l, p < 0.001) and total magnesium (1.00 +/- 0.19 vs. 0.82 +/- 0.08 mmol/l, p < 0.001) were higher in hemodialysis patients. The fraction of ionized Mg was 68.6 +/- 2.9% in hemodialysis patients, and did not differ significantly from that in controls (68.7 +/- 5.3%). The postdialysis value was 68.1 +/- 7.7%. The corresponding ratios of calcium (ionized/total) were 51.0 +/- 2.8% pre- and 50.9 +/- 4.6% postdialysis. Both prior to and after dialysis the correlation between ionized and total magnesium was high (r = 0.976, p < 0.001, and r = 0.925, p < 0.001, respectively). The corresponding ionized versus total calcium correlations were r = 0.724 (p < 0.001) before and 0.423 (p = 0.003) after dialysis. The changes induced by a hemodialysis session in serum concentration of ionized magnesium and calcium were dependent on the concentration of the cation in the dialysate. The change in PTH (suppression or stimulation) was very closely related to the changes in the serum concentration of ionized calcium. We concluded that measurement of ionized magnesium using ion-selective electrodes for Mg++ is an interesting new method in evaluating body magnesium status. Its definitive role in clinical practice cannot be judged on the basis of the results of the present study, but it will probably not achieve the same importance as the measurement of ionized calcium in clinical nephrology.

摘要

直到最近,还只有测量总镁的技术。现在,使用新型镁离子选择性电极(ISE)的商用仪器已使在临床实践中可靠测量离子化镁成为可能。我们使用ISE方法测量了血液透析过程中血清离子化镁和总镁以及钙池的变化。与年龄和性别匹配的对照受试者的水平相比,血液透析患者的血清离子化镁(0.68±0.11对0.56±0.06 mmol/l,p<0.001)和总镁(1.00±0.19对0.82±0.08 mmol/l,p<0.001)均较高。血液透析患者中离子化镁的比例为68.6±2.9%,与对照组(68.7±5.3%)无显著差异。透析后的值为68.1±7.7%。相应的钙(离子化/总)比率透析前为51.0±2.8%,透析后为50.9±4.6%。透析前后离子化镁与总镁之间的相关性都很高(分别为r = 0.976,p<0.001和r = 0.925,p<0.001)。相应的离子化钙与总钙的相关性透析前为r = 0.724(p<0.001),透析后为0.423(p = 0.003)。血液透析过程中血清离子化镁和钙浓度的变化取决于透析液中阳离子的浓度。甲状旁腺激素的变化(抑制或刺激)与血清离子化钙浓度的变化密切相关。我们得出结论,使用镁离子选择性电极测量离子化镁是评估机体镁状态的一种有趣的新方法。其在临床实践中的明确作用不能根据本研究的结果来判断,但它可能不会在临床肾脏病学中达到与测量离子化钙相同的重要性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验