Rahn K, Wilson J B, McFadden K A, Read S C, Ellis A G, Renwick S A, Clarke R C, Johnson R P
Health of Animals Laboratory, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Guelph, Ontario, Canada.
Appl Environ Microbiol. 1996 Dec;62(12):4314-7. doi: 10.1128/aem.62.12.4314-4317.1996.
Comparisons were made between Vero cell assay (VCA) and PCR as indicators for the detection of verocytotoxigenic Escherichia coli (VTEC; also known as Shiga-like toxin-producing E. coli) and as predictors of VTEC isolation from bovine and human fecal samples. Fecal samples were collected as part of a survey on the prevalence of VTEC on dairy farms in southern Ontario (J. B. Wilson et al., J. Infect. Dis., 174:1021-1027, 1996). A total of 2,655 samples were examined by VCA and PCR, 2,153 originating from cattle and 502 originating from humans. Overall, 36.2% of the samples were positive in the VCA and 38.7% were positive by PCR. Of the VCA-positive samples screened, 41.6% yielded a VTEC isolate. For both human and bovine samples, a significant positive association between PCR result and VCA titer (P = 0.0001) was found. In addition, there was a significant positive association between the PCR result and VTEC isolation from VCA-positive samples for cattle (odds ratio = 9.1, P < 0.0001). For bovine samples positive in the VCA, VCA titer was significantly associated with the probability of obtaining a VTEC isolate. Agreement between VCA and PCR was good for both bovine and human samples (kappa = 0.69 and 0.64, respectively). The sensitivity and specificity of the PCR with respect to the VCA for bovine samples were 82.0 and 86.5%, respectively, and those for human samples were 59.3 and 98.1%, respectively. Although correlation between VCA and PCR results was not absolute, when used in conjunction, these tests complemented one another as predictors of VTEC isolation.
对Vero细胞检测法(VCA)和聚合酶链反应(PCR)进行了比较,以作为检测产志贺毒素大肠杆菌(VTEC;也称为产志贺样毒素大肠杆菌)的指标,并作为从牛和人类粪便样本中分离VTEC的预测指标。粪便样本是安大略省南部奶牛场VTEC流行情况调查的一部分(J. B. 威尔逊等人,《传染病杂志》,174:1021 - 1027,1996年)。总共2655份样本通过VCA和PCR进行检测,其中2153份来自牛,502份来自人类。总体而言,36.2%的样本VCA检测呈阳性,38.7%的样本PCR检测呈阳性。在筛选出的VCA阳性样本中,41.6%分离出了VTEC菌株。对于人类和牛的样本,均发现PCR结果与VCA滴度之间存在显著正相关(P = 0.0001)。此外,牛的PCR结果与从VCA阳性样本中分离出VTEC之间存在显著正相关(优势比 = 9.1,P < 0.0001)。对于VCA检测呈阳性的牛样本,VCA滴度与获得VTEC菌株的概率显著相关。VCA和PCR在牛和人类样本中的一致性都很好(kappa值分别为0.69和0.64)。PCR相对于VCA对牛样本的敏感性和特异性分别为82.0%和86.5%,对人类样本的敏感性和特异性分别为59.3%和98.1%。虽然VCA和PCR结果之间的相关性并非绝对,但联合使用时,这些检测方法作为VTEC分离的预测指标可以相互补充。