Kudva Indira T, Oosthuysen Eben R, Wheeler Bryan, Loest Clint A
Food Safety and Enteric Pathogens Research Unit, National Animal Disease Center, Agricultural Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Ames, IA, USA.
Department of Animal and Range Sciences, New Mexico State University, Las Cruces, NW, USA.
Int J Microbiol. 2021 Apr 1;2021:6673202. doi: 10.1155/2021/6673202. eCollection 2021.
Shiga toxin-producing (STEC) serogroups O157, O26, O103, O111, O121, O145, and O45 are designated as food adulterants by the U.S. Department of Agriculture-Food Safety and Inspection Service. Cattle are the primary reservoir of these human pathogens. In this study, 59 Angus crossbred heifers were tested specifically for these seven STEC serogroups using a combination of standard culture, serological, PCR, and cell cytotoxicity methods to determine if comparable results would be obtained. At the time of fecal sampling, the animals were approximately 2 years old and weighed 1000-1200 lbs. The diet comprised of 37% ground alfalfa hay, 25% ground Sudan hay, and 38% ground corn supplemented with trace minerals and rumensin with ad libitum access to water. Non-O157 STEC were isolated from 25% (15/59) of the animals tested using a combination of EC broth, CHROMagar STEC, and Rainbow Agar O157. Interestingly, the O157 serogroup was not isolated from any of the animals. Non-O157 STEC isolates were confirmed to be one of the six adulterant serogroups by serology and/or colony PCR in 10/15 animals with the predominant viable, serogroup being O103. PCR using DNA extracted from feces verified most of the colony PCR results but also identified additional virulence and O-antigen genes from samples with no correlating culture results. Shiga toxin- (Stx-) related cytopathic effects on Vero cells with fecal extracts from 55/59 animals could only be associated with the Stx gene profiles obtained by fecal DNA PCR and not culture results. The differences between culture versus fecal DNA PCR and cytotoxicity assay results suggest that the latter two assays reflect the presence of nonviable STEC or infection with STEC not belonging to the seven adulterant serogroups. This study further supports the use of combinatorial culture, serology, and PCR methods to isolate viable STEC that pose a greater food safety threat.
产志贺毒素大肠杆菌(STEC)的O157、O26、O103、O111、O121、O145和O45血清型被美国农业部食品安全检验局指定为食品掺假物。牛是这些人类病原体的主要宿主。在本研究中,使用标准培养、血清学、PCR和细胞毒性方法相结合,对59头安格斯杂交小母牛进行了这七种STEC血清型的特异性检测,以确定是否能获得可比结果。在粪便采样时,这些动物约2岁,体重1000 - 1200磅。日粮由37%的苜蓿干草粉、25%的苏丹干草粉和38%的玉米粉组成,并补充了微量矿物质和瘤胃素,自由饮水。使用EC肉汤、CHROMagar STEC和Rainbow Agar O157组合,从25%(15/59)的受试动物中分离出非O157 STEC。有趣的是,未从任何动物中分离出O157血清型。通过血清学和/或菌落PCR在10/15只动物中确认非O157 STEC分离株为六种掺假血清型之一,主要存活血清型为O103。使用从粪便中提取的DNA进行PCR验证了大多数菌落PCR结果,但也从无相关培养结果的样本中鉴定出了额外的毒力和O抗原基因。55/59只动物的粪便提取物对Vero细胞产生的与志贺毒素(Stx)相关的细胞病变效应仅与粪便DNA PCR获得的Stx基因谱相关,而与培养结果无关。培养与粪便DNA PCR及细胞毒性试验结果之间的差异表明,后两种试验反映了非存活STEC的存在或感染了不属于七种掺假血清型的STEC。本研究进一步支持使用组合培养、血清学和PCR方法来分离对食品安全构成更大威胁的存活STEC。