Mockler D, Riordan J, Sharma T
Department of Psychology, Claybury Hospital, Essex, UK.
Br J Clin Psychol. 1996 Nov;35(4):567-72. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8260.1996.tb01212.x.
The ability of the National Adult Reading Test (NART; Nelson & Willison, 1991) and the revised NART (NART-R; Crawford, 1990) to estimate IQ was examined in a healthy sample (N = 47) using the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Revised (WAIS-R) scores as the criterion. Mean estimated IQs from the NART-R were not significantly different from the WAIS-R Full Scale and Performance IQ, but the NART-R significantly overestimated Verbal IQ by 2.5 points. Nelson & Willison's (1991) NART equations significantly overestimated Full Scale and Verbal IQ by 5.3 and 5.5 IQ points respectively. The NART-R had significantly higher correlations with Full Scale and Verbal IQ than the NART.
以修订韦氏成人智力量表（WAIS-R）分数为标准，在一个健康样本（N = 47）中检验了国家成人阅读测试（NART；Nelson和Willison，1991）以及修订版NART（NART-R；Crawford，1990）评估智商的能力。NART-R估计的平均智商与WAIS-R全量表智商和操作智商无显著差异，但NART-R显著高估了言语智商2.5分。Nelson和Willison（1991）的NART公式分别显著高估了全量表智商和言语智商5.3分和5.5分。与NART相比，NART-R与全量表智商和言语智商的相关性显著更高。
