Brunner D P, Vasko R C, Detka C S, Monahan J P, Reynolds C F, Kupfer D J
Department of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, USA.
J Sleep Res. 1996 Sep;5(3):155-64. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2869.1996.00009.x.
Owing to the use of scalp electrodes in human sleep recordings, cortical EEG signals are inevitably intermingled with the electrical activity of the muscle tissue on the skull. Muscle artifacts are characterized by surges in high frequency activity and are readily identified because of their outlying high values relative to the local background activity. To detect bursts of myogenic activity a simple algorithm is introduced that compares high frequency activity (26.25-32.0 Hz) in each 4-s epoch with the activity level in a local 3-min window. A 4-s value was considered artifactual if it exceeded the local background activity by a certain factor. Sensitivity and specificity of the artifact detection algorithm were empirically adjusted by applying different factors as artifact thresholds. In an analysis of sleep EEG signals recorded from 25 healthy young adults 2.3% (SEM: 0.16) of all 4-s epochs during sleep were identified as artifacts when a threshold factor of four was applied. Contamination of the EEG by muscle activity was more frequent towards the end of non-REM sleep episodes when EEG slow wave activity declined. Within and across REM sleep episodes muscle artifacts were evenly distributed. When the EEG signal was cleared of muscle artifacts, the all-night EEG power spectrum showed significant reductions in power density for all frequencies from 0.25-32.0 Hz. Between 15 and 32 Hz, muscle artifacts made up a substantial part (20-70%) of all-night EEG power density. It is concluded that elimination of short-lasting muscle artifacts reduces the confound between cortical and myogenic activity and is important in interpreting quantitative EEG data. Quantitative approaches in defining and detecting transient events in the EEG signal may help to determine which EEG phenomena constitute clinically significant arousals.
由于在人类睡眠记录中使用头皮电极,皮质脑电图(EEG)信号不可避免地与颅骨上肌肉组织的电活动混合在一起。肌肉伪迹的特征是高频活动激增,并且由于其相对于局部背景活动的异常高值而易于识别。为了检测肌源性活动的爆发,引入了一种简单的算法,该算法将每个4秒时段内的高频活动(26.25 - 32.0赫兹)与局部3分钟窗口内的活动水平进行比较。如果一个4秒的值超过局部背景活动一定倍数,则被认为是伪迹。通过应用不同的倍数作为伪迹阈值,凭经验调整伪迹检测算法的灵敏度和特异性。在对25名健康年轻成年人记录的睡眠EEG信号进行的分析中,当应用四倍的阈值倍数时,睡眠期间所有4秒时段中有2.3%(标准误:0.16)被识别为伪迹。当EEG慢波活动下降时,在非快速眼动(REM)睡眠阶段接近尾声时,EEG受肌肉活动的污染更为频繁。在REM睡眠阶段内和不同REM睡眠阶段之间,肌肉伪迹分布均匀。当从EEG信号中清除肌肉伪迹后,整夜EEG功率谱显示,在0.25 - 32.0赫兹的所有频率下,功率密度都有显著降低。在15至32赫兹之间,肌肉伪迹占整夜EEG功率密度的很大一部分(20 - 70%)。得出的结论是,消除短暂的肌肉伪迹可减少皮质活动和肌源性活动之间的混淆,这对于解释定量EEG数据很重要。在定义和检测EEG信号中的瞬态事件时采用定量方法,可能有助于确定哪些EEG现象构成临床上有意义的觉醒。