Browning W D, Dennison J B
University of Tennessee-Memphis, College of Dentistry, Department of General Dentistry, USA.
Oper Dent. 1996 Jul-Aug;21(4):160-6.
This study was undertaken as a first step in identifying opportunities to decrease the need for replacement of class 3, 4, and 5 composite resin restorations. Data regarding the reasons for original placement or replacement of a restoration, the age of restorations at the time of replacement, and patient/doctor factors that may be associated with a decision to place or replace a restoration were recorded by use of a cross-sectional survey. During a 2-week period 108 dentists recorded reasons for placing or replacing 1360 restorations. Of the 1360 restorations, 42.8% were classified as primary placement and 57.2% as replacement restorations. Of the primary placements 80% were categorized as being due to caries; 9.1% fracture of tooth; 8.4% other (erosion lesions were specified 94% of the time). By class, caries was the dominant cause for class 3 (96.2%); caries and other (erosion) for class 5 (77.3% and 16.4%); fracture of tooth and caries (48.9% and 40.2%) for class 4 restorations.
本研究是确定减少3类、4类和5类复合树脂修复体替换需求机会的第一步。通过横断面调查记录了有关修复体最初放置或替换原因、替换时修复体的使用年限以及可能与放置或替换修复体决策相关的患者/医生因素的数据。在为期2周的时间里,108名牙医记录了放置或替换1360个修复体的原因。在这1360个修复体中,42.8%被归类为初次放置,57.2%为替换修复体。在初次放置的修复体中,80%归因于龋齿;9.1%是牙齿折断;8.4%为其他情况(94%的情况下明确为侵蚀性病变)。按类别划分,龋齿是3类修复体的主要原因(96.2%);5类修复体的原因是龋齿和其他情况(侵蚀,分别为77.3%和16.4%);4类修复体的原因是牙齿折断和龋齿(分别为48.9%和40.2%)。